How is energy density calculated

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of Planck density is derived from the equation Density = c5/(h x G2), resulting in a value of approximately E93 to E94 gm/cm3. This discussion highlights the significant discrepancy between the observed cosmological constant (E-29 gm/cm3) and the calculated value, which differs by E123. The cosmological constant, represented as Lambda, is integral to Einstein's General Relativity equations and is essential for explaining the universe's accelerating expansion. The referenced essay by Eugenio Bianchi and Carlo Rovelli critiques common arguments against the viability of Lambda as a constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck units, specifically Planck length and Planck volume
  • Familiarity with Einstein's General Relativity equations
  • Knowledge of quantum field theory (QFT) and vacuum energy density
  • Basic grasp of cosmological constants and their implications in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the cosmological constant in modern cosmology
  • Study the derivation and significance of Planck density in theoretical physics
  • Explore the arguments presented in the essay by Eugenio Bianchi and Carlo Rovelli
  • Learn about the relationship between dark energy and the expansion of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology seeking to deepen their understanding of energy density calculations and the cosmological constant's role in the universe's expansion.

jimjohnson
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I understand how the Planck length (1.6 x E-33 cm) is calculated from the equation ,Gh/( 2πc3), but how is the Planck density calculated at E-5 gm/Planck volume (E93 to E94 gm/cm3). It is based on "energy jitters".
Also, is there an explanation for the vast difference between the observed cosmological constant (E-29 gm/cm3) and calculated value, a difference of E123? Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
the best discussion I have seen so far of the cosmological constant issue is this essay by a couple of quantum relativists.
Lambda naturally occurs as a curvature constant in the Einstein GR equation.
There is no reason to connect it with the gross QFT miscalculation of the vacuum energy density.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3966
Why all these prejudices against a constant?
Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli
(Submitted on 21 Feb 2010)
The expansion of the observed universe appears to be accelerating. A simple explanation of this phenomenon is provided by the non-vanishing of the cosmological constant in the Einstein equations. Arguments are commonly presented to the effect that this simple explanation is not viable or not sufficient, and therefore we are facing the "great mystery" of the "nature of a dark energy". We argue that these arguments are unconvincing, or ill-founded.
9 pages, 4 figures
 
Great reference, who would think that this profound mystery (E120 difference)is "nonsense".
Also, I did find the equation for density in a sepatare reference, Density = c5/(h x G2). Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K