How is maths separated from religion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chinspinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Religion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the distinction between mathematics and religion in the context of theoretical physics, specifically regarding concepts like dark matter and dark energy. Participants assert that while these concepts are mathematically derived, they are valid scientific explanations for observed phenomena, despite the challenges in experimental verification. The conversation highlights the importance of the scientific method in gradually enhancing our understanding of complex phenomena, countering the notion that theoretical physics is akin to religious belief. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that the initial premise mischaracterizes the roles of science, mathematics, and religion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts such as dark matter and dark energy.
  • Familiarity with the scientific method and its application in experimental verification.
  • Basic knowledge of cosmological and astronomical models.
  • Awareness of the philosophical implications of science versus religion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical frameworks used in cosmology, focusing on dark matter and dark energy.
  • Explore the scientific method's role in experimental verification within theoretical physics.
  • Study the implications of singularities in physics and their impact on our understanding of the universe.
  • Investigate the philosophical debates surrounding science and religion, particularly in the context of theoretical constructs.
USEFUL FOR

Scientists, philosophers, students of physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of mathematics, theoretical physics, and the philosophy of science.

Chinspinner
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
This is not a religious diatribe, I am an agnostic leaning heavily towards atheism.

But, dark matter and dark energy are just equations used to close a gaping hole in our understanding. Singularities are not understood. Expansion is not understood.

But more importantly, theoretical physics often cannot be experimentally verified. If we are throwing the scientific method out of the window, how is this mathematical magic different from religion? Is this a cul-de-sac we have been trapped in too long? Or can it be verified without experiment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chinspinner said:
But, dark matter and dark energy are just equations used to close a gaping hole in our understanding.

Nonsense. Both dark energy and dark matter are valid explanations for observed phenomena. The fact that they depend heavily upon math is no different than any modern theory.

Chinspinner said:
Singularities are not understood. Expansion is not understood.

The list of poorly understood phenomena is large and will probably never be zero. The key is that science leads to a gradual understanding of phenomena that were previously unknown or not understood at all and it does so through the use of math and the application of the scientific method.

Chinspinner said:
But more importantly, theoretical physics often cannot be experimentally verified. If we are throwing the scientific method out of the window, how is this mathematical magic different from religion? Is this a cul-de-sac we have been trapped in too long? Or can it be verified without experiment?

Comparing data from observations made through telescopes to various cosmological and astronomical models and eliminating those which cannot support the observations is a shining example of experimental verification. We may not know exactly what dark energy or dark matter is, but we know a great deal about what it isn't.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PWiz
The whole premise of this question mischaracterizes science, mathematics and religion. All three. How can a useful discussion follow from such a start?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule, phinds and Borg
Vanadium 50 said:
The whole premise of this question mischaracterizes science, mathematics and religion. All three. How can a useful discussion follow from such a start?
Agreed. This topic is not appropriate for PF.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jtbell, russ_watters and Ryan_m_b

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K