How is observer defined in context to quantum physics?does it have

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nouveau_riche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observer Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of an observer in the context of quantum physics, particularly whether a conscious observer is necessary for observation and the implications of measurement in quantum mechanics. Participants explore various interpretations of the observer effect, measurement, and the double-slit experiment, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that an observer does not have to be conscious, stating that observation can be any event mathematically equivalent to applying an operator on a quantum state.
  • Others highlight the double-slit experiment as a key example, noting that the presence of light and the ability to distinguish which slit an electron passes through affect the resulting pattern observed.
  • There is a discussion about what constitutes an event being mathematically equivalent to applying an operator, with references to axioms of quantum mechanics.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the implications of measurement and whether interference patterns can coexist with position measurements in the double-slit experiment.
  • One participant mentions that if one observer measures the position of a photon, the interference pattern would be lost, regardless of another observer's actions.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of setting up experiments where two observers can independently measure different aspects of the same quantum event without influencing each other.
  • Some participants reference external sources, including Wikipedia and other threads, to support their claims and clarify their understanding.
  • A layperson expresses difficulty in following the mainstream theories and suggests a preference for established theorists over popular interpretations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, particularly regarding the necessity of consciousness in observation and the implications of measurement on interference patterns. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding the nuances of measurement in quantum mechanics, particularly concerning the role of observers and the conditions under which interference patterns are observed. Some participants express uncertainty about the interpretations and implications of their claims.

  • #31


I like Serena said:
Yep! :)

Any light source that makes it observable through which slit an electron goes, destroys the interference pattern (for all observers).

but there's another experiment i got which i think could give real weirdness...\

"consider the same interference experiment,the interference pattern produced is used to illuminate the next source in series,which then produces a new interference pattern,this gets cascaded say 10 times and the final interference pattern is obtained on the wall.
now ,the observer, observing the final interference pattern is not known of the fact that there's another observer measuring the particle position in the first stage of interference,and viceversa

"will ur answer b the same(no interference pattern) or something else?
and if u think that the experiment is not possible,state the reason along
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


nouveau_riche said:
but there's another experiment i got which i think could give real weirdness...\

"consider the same interference experiment,the interference pattern produced is used to illuminate the next source in series,which then produces a new interference pattern,this gets cascaded say 10 times and the final interference pattern is obtained on the wall.
now ,the observer, observing the final interference pattern is not known of the fact that there's another observer measuring the particle position in the first stage of interference,and viceversa

"will ur answer b the same(no interference pattern) or something else?
and if u think that the experiment is not possible,state the reason along

This experiment can be done just fine, although you seem to be mixing electrons with photons.
But that's not really a problem, it doesn't really matter which of them you use.

Cascading through a number of interference patterns will reduce the chance that a photon/electron will reveal which slit an electron/photon goes through.
I believe that the result will be a mixture of an interference pattern and a destroyed interference pattern (for all observers).
 
  • #33


I like Serena said:
This experiment can be done just fine, although you seem to be mixing electrons with photons.
But that's not really a problem, it doesn't really matter which of them you use.

Cascading through a number of interference patterns will reduce the chance that a photon/electron will reveal which slit an electron/photon goes through.
I believe that the result will be a mixture of an interference pattern and a destroyed interference pattern (for all observers).
i think the result will still b the same as it was with previous experiment
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
674
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K