How is the proof of the hard limit problem related to continuity of a function?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cephal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Limit Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof of a limit related to integrals of functions multiplied by powers of \( x \) as \( n \) approaches infinity. Participants explore the relationship between the continuity of functions and the behavior of these integrals, specifically focusing on functions \( g \) and \( f \) that are continuous and differentiable on the interval \([0,1]\).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the limit \( \lim_{n\to+\infty} n\int_{0}^1 x^ng(x)\mathrm{d}x=g(1) \) holds for continuous functions \( g \) on \([0,1]\).
  • Others propose a specific form for the integral \( \int_0^1 x^n f(x)\mathrm{d}x \) and suggest that it can be expressed in terms of \( f(1) \) and its derivative, with additional terms involving \( n \).
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of continuity for the univocal definition of functions at the endpoint \( x=1 \) and discusses the implications for integrability.
  • Some participants suggest using integration by parts to derive the desired results, while others caution against assuming higher-order differentiability of \( f \).
  • There are discussions about the assumptions necessary for the proofs, particularly regarding the continuity and differentiability of the functions involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the limit involving \( g \) but have differing views on how to approach the proof for the integral involving \( f \). There is no consensus on the necessity of higher-order derivatives or the exact form of the integral's expansion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the continuity of \( f \) is not sufficient to guarantee its differentiability, which affects the assumptions made in the proofs. The discussion also highlights the need for careful handling of terms as \( n \) approaches infinity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in advanced calculus, particularly those exploring limits, integrals, and the properties of continuous and differentiable functions.

Cephal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I have proved that:

$$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to+\infty} n\int_{0}^1 x^ng(x)\mathrm{d}x=g(1)$$
with $$g \in\mathcal{C}^0(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.But I don't know how to prove this:

$$\displaystyle \int_0^1 x^n f(x)\mathrm{d}x=\dfrac{f(1)}{n}-\dfrac{f(1)+f'(1)}{n^2}+o_{+\infty}(\dfrac{1}{n^2})$$
with $$f\in\mathcal{C}^1(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.
(Tongueout)
Thank you for your answers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cephal said:
Hello everybody,

I have prove that:

$$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to+\infty} n\int_{0}^1 x^ng(x)\mathrm{d}x=g(1)$$
with $$g \in\mathcal{C}^0(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.But I don't know how to prove this:

$$\displaystyle \int_0^1 x^n f(x)\mathrm{d}x=\dfrac{f(1)}{n}-\dfrac{f(1)+f'(1)}{n^2}+o_{+\infty}(\dfrac{1}{n^2})$$
with $$f\in\mathcal{C}^1(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.
(Tongueout)
Thank you for your answers.
Hi Cephal, and welcome to MHB!

What you know about $g$ is (1) $g$ is continuous and therefore bounded on $[0,1]$, say $|g(x)| \leqslant M$ for some $M$; (2) $g(x)$ is continuous at $x=1$ and therefore given $\varepsilon>0$ there exists $\delta>0$ such that $|g(x) - g(1)| < \varepsilon$ whenever $1- \delta \leqslant x \leqslant 1$.

Now write $$n\int_0^1 x^n g(x)\,dx = n\int_0^{1-\delta} x^n g(x)\,dx + n\int_{1-\delta}^1 x^n g(x)\,dx.$$ Show that if $n$ is large then the first of those integrals is small and the second one is close to $g(1)$.
 
Thank you Opalg for your answer.

In fact I have already proved that:

$$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to+\infty} n\int_{0}^1 x^ng(x)\mathrm{d}x=g(1)$$
with $$g \in\mathcal{C}^0(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.My problem is to prove this:

$$\displaystyle \int_0^1 x^n f(x)\mathrm{d}x=\dfrac{f(1)}{n}-\dfrac{f(1)+f'(1)}{n^2}+o_{+\infty}(\dfrac{1}{n^2})$$
with $$f\in\mathcal{C}^1(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.

Thank you for your help.
 
Cephal said:
Hello everybody,

I have proved that:

$$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to+\infty} n\int_{0}^1 x^ng(x)\mathrm{d}x=g(1)$$
with $$g \in\mathcal{C}^0(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.But I don't know how to prove this:

$$\displaystyle \int_0^1 x^n f(x)\mathrm{d}x=\dfrac{f(1)}{n}-\dfrac{f(1)+f'(1)}{n^2}+o_{+\infty}(\dfrac{1}{n^2})$$
with $$f\in\mathcal{C}^1(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$.
(Tongueout)
Thank you for your answers.

You can proceed with integration by parts obtaining... $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} x^{n}\ f(x)\ dx = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{1}{n+1}\ \int_{0}^{1} x^{n + 1}\ f^{\ '} (x)\ dx =$

$\displaystyle = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{(n+1) (n+2)} + \frac{1}{(n+1) (n+2)}\ \int_{0}^{1} x^{n+2}\ f^{\ ''} (x)\ d x\ (1)$

Now if You consider that...

$\displaystyle \frac{f(1)}{n + 1} = \frac{f(1)}{n} - \frac{f(1)}{n^{2}} + \mathcal{o}\ (\frac{1}{n^{2}})\ (2)$

... and...

$\displaystyle \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{(n+1) (n+2)} = \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{n^{2}} + \mathcal{o}\ (\frac{1}{n^{2}})\ (3)$

... You arrive to the result...Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
You can proceed with integration by parts obtaining... $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} x^{n}\ f(x)\ dx = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{1}{n+1}\ \int_{0}^{1} x^{n + 1}\ f^{\ '} (x)\ dx =$

$\displaystyle = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{(n+1) (n+2)} + \frac{1}{(n+1) (n+2)}\ \int_{0}^{1} x^{n+2}\ f^{\ ''} (x)\ d x\ (1)$

Now if You consider that...

$\displaystyle \frac{f(1)}{n + 1} = \frac{f(1)}{n} - \frac{f(1)}{n^{2}} + \mathcal{o}\ (\frac{1}{n^{2}})\ (2)$

... and...

$\displaystyle \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{(n+1) (n+2)} = \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{n^{2}} + \mathcal{o}\ (\frac{1}{n^{2}})\ (3)$

... You arrive to the result...Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$

Thank you very very much $$\chi\sigma$$.(Clapping)
 
Apologies for not reading the original question carefully enough. Chisigma's approach is certainly the right way to go. My only comment on it is that you are only told that $$f\in\mathcal{C}^1(\left[0,1\right],\mathbb{R})$$. So you should not assume that $f$ is twice differentiable. Instead, use chisigma's method to integrate by parts just once, getting $$\int_{0}^{1} x^{n}f(x)\, dx = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{1}{n+1} \int_{0}^{1} x^{n + 1} f^{\, '} (x)\, dx. $$ Then write that as $$\int_{0}^{1} x^{n}f(x)\, dx = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{1}{(n+1)^2}\left[(n+1) \int_{0}^{1} x^{n + 1} f^{\, '} (x)\, dx\right], $$ and use the previous result about $g(x)$ to conclude that the part in the large brackets is $f^{\, '} (1) + o_{n\to\infty}(1).$
 
Now is my turn to apologies because I have had a little hurry in my last post, so that some essential step has been omitted. The most important step I have omitted is that continuity is not neccesary condition for integrability of a function but is necessary condition for univocal definition of a function in a closed interval. Now if we write again...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} x^{n}\ f(x)\ d x = \frac{f(1)}{n+1} - \frac{f^{\ '}(1)}{(n + 1) (n + 2)} + \frac{1}{(n+1) (n+2)}\ \int_{0}^{1} x^{n+2}
f^{\ ''}(x)\ dx\ (1)$

... taking into account the relations...

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n + 1} = \frac{1}{n}\ (1 - \frac{1}{n} + \frac{1}{n^{2}} - ...)\ (2)$

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n+2} = \frac{1}{n}\ (1 - \frac{2}{n} + \frac{4}{n^{2}} - ...)\ (3)$

all that we can say is...

a) if f(*) is continuous in [0,1] then f(*) is 'well defined' in x=1 and is...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} x^{n}\ f(x)\ dx = \frac{f(1)}{n} + \mathcal {o}\ (\frac{1}{n})\ (4)$

b) if f(*) and its derivative are continuous in [0,1] then f(*) and its derivative are 'well defined' in x=1 and is...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} x^{n}\ f(x)\ dx = \frac{f(1)}{n} - \frac{f(1) + f^{\ '}(1)}{n^{2}} + \mathcal {o}\ (\frac{1}{n^{2}})\ (5)$

Of course if all the derivatives of f(x) in x=1 are 'well defined', then we can extend the expansion without limits...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K