How long do saved drafts last?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Saved drafts on the forum have a time limit, which was initially 24 hours but has been extended to 48 hours. Users expressed confusion about the absence of a clear "Save Draft" option, leading to concerns about lost posts. The only available actions are POST REPLY, PREVIEW, and UPLOAD, with the "Save Draft" function indicated by a disk icon. Some users initially overlooked the draft-saving feature due to its placement and labeling. Understanding the draft-saving mechanism is crucial for preventing the loss of unfinished posts.
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
2,670
Reaction score
11,561
I started a new post a coulple of days ago, but had other things to deal with before I finished it, so I saved the draft.
The draft was there yesterday, but now it is gone.

Did I do something wrong?
Is there a time limit for saved drafts?
Is something broke with the website?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry Bill! 24 hours but I've increased it to 48 hours now.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and jim mcnamara
Thanks Greg.
Now I know.
 
Looking for any "Save Draft" option...?
No such option no such link
--Preview-- ?
Nothing there.

Why do we see an UPLOAD button? To what/to where?

Only three things can be done:
POST REPLY, PREVIEW, and UPLOAD.
I see no button for SAVE DRAFT.
 
Its the little disk icon above the space in which you type the text for a response or new thread.
Between x2 and the counterclockwise circular arrow (redo).

Upload is for putting an image on your computer into a post.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
BillTre said:
Its the little disk icon above the space in which you type the text for a response or new thread.
Between x2 and the counterclockwise circular arrow (redo).

Upload is for putting an image on your computer into a post.
NOW I see it. The mouse-over caption does say, "Drafts". Earlier I missed seeing.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top