How Long Does It Take for Connected Water Tanks to Equalize Pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zax
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for two connected water tanks with different pressures to equalize. Participants explore various factors affecting the flow and pressure changes, including hydrodynamics, thermodynamics, and pipe configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the application of Poiseuille's law to determine flow rates between the tanks.
  • Another participant emphasizes that flow is restricted by pipe lengths, fittings, and valves, and suggests considering thermodynamic factors and heat transfer in calculations.
  • A participant proposes a scenario with two cold water tanks at atmospheric pressure and questions the best calculation method to ensure simultaneous water draw from both tanks.
  • Discussion includes the importance of minimizing irreversible pressure drops in the piping to achieve balanced flow between the tanks.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of cross-sectional venting and its potential impact on flow, with one questioning the specifics of venting requirements.
  • Concerns are raised about accounting for accelerated suction velocities when a pump is involved in the configuration.
  • Flow analysis is recommended by participants to avoid unexpected issues in the system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the factors affecting flow and pressure equalization, with no consensus reached on specific calculation methods or the importance of certain parameters.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about tank configurations, the effects of heat transfer, and the specific conditions under which calculations are made. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in fluid dynamics, hydrodynamics, and engineering applications related to water tank systems may find this discussion relevant.

zax
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have a problem in which there are two water tanks with different pressure. If they are connected together, how to calculate the time it takes to arrive to the steady state(same pressure)?
Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hydrodynamics

:smile:Have you tried Poiseuille's law? Does this sound familiar - the total volume of liquid which flows across the entire cross-section of a cylindrical tube in time? See link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poiseuille's_law
 
Thank you for the reply.
The detail of the problem is that two tanks have pressure 87psi and 40 psi respectively. The 40psi tank connects to the water main. The 87psi tank has a expansion tank connected. When they are connected together, is it possible to know how pressure in the 87psi tank change with time?
Thanks for any help.
 
hi zax,
The flow of water is restricted by the various pipe lengths, fittings and valves you have installed between the tanks. The change in pressure is also a function of the thermodynamics of the air in the tank and heat transfer.

Look through this post https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=221054"to get a general idea of some of the concepts and what you might do to calculate things. In your case you might want to simplify the heat transfer and thermodynamics a bit. If you need help understanding flow restrictions, check the attached. Generally in industry, we use the Darcey Weisbach equation as indicated on the attached.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Q_Goest said:
hi zax,
The flow of water is restricted by the various pipe lengths, fittings and valves you have installed between the tanks. The change in pressure is also a function of the thermodynamics of the air in the tank and heat transfer.

Look through this post here to get a general idea of some of the concepts and what you might do to calculate things. In your case you might want to simplify the heat transfer and thermodynamics a bit. If you need help understanding flow restrictions, check the attached. Generally in industry, we use the Darcey Weisbach equation as indicated on the attached.

What if there was no heat transfer just 2 cold water tanks at atmospheric pressure and both tanks were say a head pressure of 30psi? What would be the best claculation method to ensure both tanks draw water at the same time and not have one tank draw down before the other one starts its draw down?
 
tletterm said:
What if there was no heat transfer just 2 cold water tanks at atmospheric pressure and both tanks were say a head pressure of 30psi? What would be the best claculation method to ensure both tanks draw water at the same time and not have one tank draw down before the other one starts its draw down?
All you should need to do is to ensure the irreversible pressure drop in the pipe from each tank to the point where the two lines connect is relatively small. The best way to do this is to use lines large enough so that given your highest expected flow through those pipes, the flow restriction is small. In the case of a 30 psi head tank, you might for example try to minimize the irreversible pressure drop between the tank and T to a few psi or less. The smaller you make this pressure loss, the closer the tanks will come to emptying equally.

Once you get to the T in the line that connects the 2 tanks, it no longer matters how much restriction you put in the line downstream of that T.

Note that this assumes the tanks are at the same elevation. If that isn't true, you may have to actively control tank level.
 
Awsome so bascially ballancing the pressures at were the Two lines connect. Does the cross sectional venting associated with the Tank have to be at least 1-1/2 the cross sectional diameter of the discharge piping configeration in order to flow correctly should this be calculated as well or does it matter. One more thing if a pump is attached to this configeration does accelerated suction velocities need to be accounted for to ensure the ballanced pressure at the connection point of the lines connecting the two tanks?

Thank You for the reply it is great information
 
tletterm said:
Does the cross sectional venting associated with the Tank have to be at least 1-1/2 the cross sectional diameter of the discharge piping configeration in order to flow correctly should this be calculated as well or does it matter.
Not sure what you mean by the "cross sectional venting". Are your tanks enclosed such that they need a vent? Or are you referring to the liquid discharge lines? In any case, I'd suggest performing a flow analysis on every line so there are no surprises.

tletterm said:
One more thing if a pump is attached to this configeration does accelerated suction velocities need to be accounted for to ensure the ballanced pressure at the connection point of the lines connecting the two tanks?
I would always do a flow analysis including any acceleration losses to ensure adequate NPSH to the pump. Basically, add the irreversible flow losses into the equation for head and acceleration losses as shown by equation 16 of the manual I posted above.
 
Q_Goest said:
Not sure what you mean by the "cross sectional venting". Are your tanks enclosed such that they need a vent? Or are you referring to the liquid discharge lines? In any case, I'd suggest performing a flow analysis on every line so there are no surprises.


I would always do a flow analysis including any acceleration losses to ensure adequate NPSH to the pump. Basically, add the irreversible flow losses into the equation for head and acceleration losses as shown by equation 16 of the manual I posted above.

Thank You for the information
 
  • #10
Thank you for the information
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K