How long would it take to get to Alpha Centauri?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yoyopizza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alpha Alpha centauri
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the time it would take to travel to Alpha Centauri, approximately 4.37 light-years away from Earth, considering various speeds and relativistic effects. Participants explore theoretical scenarios involving different velocities, particularly near-light speeds, and the implications for time experienced by travelers versus observers on Earth. The context includes both conceptual and mathematical reasoning relevant to a narrative or story writing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes calculating travel time to Alpha Centauri at 9/10c, noting that relativistic effects would alter the perceived distance.
  • Another participant clarifies the distinction between travel time as perceived by someone on the spaceship versus someone on Earth, providing equations for both scenarios.
  • A question arises regarding the correct interpretation of the mathematical expression used for calculating time.
  • Some participants suggest that achieving a travel time of around 50 years in the spaceship's frame may require speeds close to 0.999934c, while others argue that a speed of 0.09c could suffice with minimal relativistic effects.
  • Links to online calculators are shared, which allow for different travel scenarios, including constant acceleration and deceleration.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the distance to Alpha Centauri, correcting their earlier misrepresentation of the problem.
  • Another participant discusses the feasibility of accelerating at 1g, suggesting that such a journey could take about 3.58 years for travelers and 6 years for Earth observers.
  • Concerns are raised about the immense energy requirements for long-distance travel at 1g acceleration, questioning the practicality of such a scenario.
  • A speculative idea is introduced about future technology that could allow for fuel gathering in space, potentially changing the energy dynamics of interstellar travel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the speeds required for a 50-year journey to Alpha Centauri, with some advocating for near-light speeds while others suggest lower speeds might be adequate. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to achieve the desired travel time and the associated technological implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about constant acceleration, the feasibility of fuel gathering in space, and the practical implications of relativistic travel. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of energy requirements or the technological advancements needed for such journeys.

Who May Find This Useful

Writers and enthusiasts interested in science fiction, particularly those exploring themes of interstellar travel and relativistic physics, may find the insights and calculations shared in this discussion valuable.

yoyopizza
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
So Alpha Centauri is about 4.37 lightyears from earth, but that's in Earth's frame of reference, if you could build a spaceship to go, say 9/10c relative to Earth how long would it take to get to alpha centauri, because then space-time would be warped and therefore it would no longer be 4.37 lightyears away relative to the space craft. Also what equation did you use so I can modify it if it takes to long(i'm writing a story, and it needs to be reasonable like 50 years or so if possible)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yoyopizza said:
So Alpha Centauri is about 4.37 lightyears from earth, but that's in Earth's frame of reference, if you could build a spaceship to go, say 9/10c relative to Earth how long would it take to get to alpha centauri, because then space-time would be warped and therefore it would no longer be 4.37 lightyears away relative to the space craft. Also what equation did you use so I can modify it if it takes to long(i'm writing a story, and it needs to be reasonable like 50 years or so if possible)

How long for who, someone on the spaceship or someone on earth? For someone on earth, it would appear the ship took (4.37 / .9) years to arrive. For someone on the spaceship, it would appear to take less time: (4.37/.9) √(1 - (.9)^2)

Plug other numbers in for .9, as you see fit.
 
When you put (4.37/.9) √(1 - (.9)^2), is that (4.37/.9)* √(1 - (.9)^2), or (4.37/.9)/ √(1 - (.9)^2)
 
The first one.
 
Also, note that if ~50 years (from the spaceship's) reference frame is what you're after, you only need the ship to travel at around 0.09c. At this speed, relativistic effects are sufficiently small that it's only a couple months longer in the Earth's frame.
 
LastOneStanding said:
Also, note that if ~50 years (from the spaceship's) reference frame is what you're after, you only need the ship to travel at around 0.09c. At this speed, relativistic effects are sufficiently small that it's only a couple months longer in the Earth's frame.
I don't know what problem you're trying to solve but the one the OP stated requires a speed very, very close to that of light, slightly faster than 0.999934c.
 
ghwellsjr said:
I don't know what problem you're trying to solve but the one the OP stated requires a speed very, very close to that of light, slightly faster than 0.999934c.

Huh? To get to alpha centauri in 50 years? Even for Earth time, it's only 4.37 light years, so 1/10 c would take 43.7 years to get there.
 
ghwellsjr said:
I don't know what problem you're trying to solve but the one the OP stated requires a speed very, very close to that of light, slightly faster than 0.999934c.

I think it would be helpful if you explained which problem you are trying to solve. The OP's problem was going to Alpha Centauri in 50 years (according to the rocket's frame) which is what I solved.
 
  • #10
ghwellsjr said:
I don't know what problem you're trying to solve but the one the OP stated requires a speed very, very close to that of light, slightly faster than 0.999934c.

PAllen said:
Huh? To get to alpha centauri in 50 years? Even for Earth time, it's only 4.37 light years, so 1/10 c would take 43.7 years to get there.

LastOneStanding said:
I think it would be helpful if you explained which problem you are trying to solve. The OP's problem was going to Alpha Centauri in 50 years (according to the rocket's frame) which is what I solved.

You guys are right. For some reason, I was thinking the distance was 4370 light-years, so I was the one that was misrepresenting the OP's problem.

Thanks for the correction and sorry for the mixup.
 
  • #11
To yoyopizza:
Travel to a distant star needs to be realistically comfortable for the travelers. That implies that spaceship acceleration (to speeds near light speed) should be about the same as the gravitational acceleration one experiences on Earth, namely 1g (which = 1.0326 ly/y^2).
Accelerating at 1g to the midpoint and then decelerating at 1g from midpoint to Alpha Centauri will result in a trip time of about 3.58 years on the travelers’ clock and 6.00 years on Earth’s clock. At midpoint the speed will be about 0.952 c.
 
  • #12
To yoyopizza:
I should have mentioned in the earlier reply that your story need not be limited to traveling to Alpha Centauri. With 1g acceleration/deceleration any galaxy/star in the observable universe (that is, out to about 13.7 BILLION light-years) can be visited with less than about 45 years of traveler's time.
 
  • #13
The amount of energy needed to uniformly accelerate a spaceship at 1g for billions of light years is astronomically large. I suspect it would violate yoyopizza's requirement of "reasonable".
 
  • #14
To LastOneStanding:
Yes of course, if you have to carry all the needed fuel at take off (old technology).

But what if technology has advanced to the point where the ship can gather its fuel components from intergalactic space (Hydrogen, Helium), manufactures what's needed, and exhausts it at higher velocity?
 
  • #15
Thanks guys this should be more than enough, when I mentioned 50 years I just meant it had to take less than that. Also, thank you Bandersnatch for the calculators, I plan to use them in the future!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K