MHB How many chocolates did Angeline give to Billie

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Angeline had 70 more chocolates than Billie, represented as x = y + 70. After giving 20% of her chocolates to Billie, the equation y + 0.2x = 0.8x + 20 describes their new totals. By substituting y from the first equation into the second, we find x - 70 = 0.6x + 20. Solving this gives x = 90, meaning Angeline originally had 90 chocolates. Consequently, Angeline gave Billie 18 chocolates, as 20% of 90 is 18.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Angeline and Billie shared some chocolates. Angeline had 70 more chocolates than Billie. After Angeline gave 20% of her sweets to Billie, Billie had 20 more chocolates than Angeline. How many chocolates did Angeline give to Billie?

(This is another word problem that can be approached by the model method...(Nod))
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That looks like a pretty standard "algebra" problem. Let x be the number of chocolates Angeline had and let y be the number of chocolates Billy had.

" Angeline had 70 more chocolates than Billie."
x= y+ 70 or y=x- 70.

" After Angeline gave 20% of her sweets to Billie, Billie had 20 more chocolates than Angeline."
20% of Angeline's sweets is 0.2x. After Angeline gives them to Billie she has x- 0.2x= 0.8x and Billie has y+ 0.2x sweets. y+ 0.2x= 0.8x+ 20. Subtract 0.2x from both sides to get y= 0.6x+ 20.

We have both y= x- 70 and y= 0.6x+ 20 so x- 70= 0.6x+ 20.

Solve that for x." How many chocolates did Angeline give to Billie?"
Multiply x by 0.2.
 
[TIKZ]
\draw (0,0) rectangle (2,1);
\draw (-8,0) rectangle (0,1);
\draw [<->] (-8, 1.4) -- (0.8, 1.4);
\node at (-3,1.6) {\small 4 units};
\draw [<->] (0, 1.2) -- (2, 1.2);
\node at (1,1.8) {\small 70 chocolates};
\node at (0.4,0.4) {\tiny 1 part};
\node at (1.4,0.4) {\tiny 1 unit};
\draw[thick, dotted] (0.8, 0) -- (0.8, 1);
\node at (-8.6,0.5) {\small A};
\node at (-8.6,-1) {\small B};
\draw (-8,-1.5) rectangle (0,-0.5);
\draw (0,-1.5) rectangle (1.2,-0.5);
\draw[thick, dotted] (0.8, -1.5) -- (0.8, -0.5);
\node at (0.4,-1) {\tiny 1 part};
\node at (1,-1) {\tiny 20};
\draw[very thick, dotted,green] (0,-1.5) rectangle (1.2,-0.5);
\draw[ultra thick, dotted,green] (0,-1.5) rectangle (1.2,-0.5);
\draw[ultra thick, dotted,green] (0.8,0) rectangle (2,1);
\draw[gray, thick, - >] (2.1,0.5) -- (2.2,0.5) -- (2.2,-1) -- (1.3,-1);
\draw [<->] (0,-1.7) rectangle (1.2,-1.7);
\node at (0.7,-1.85) {\tiny 1 unit};
[/TIKZ]

We are looking for the value of 1 unit.

$\begin{align*} 1 \text{ part}+1 \text{ unit}&=70\\1 \text{ part} +20&=1 \text{ unit}\\1 \text{ unit} -20&=70-1 \text{ unit}\\ 2 \text{ units}&=90\\ \therefore 1 \text{ unit}&=45\end{align*}$
 
That would be better if you had said what "one unit" and "one part" are in terms of numbers of chocolates.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
968
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
929
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K