MHB How many chocolates did Angeline give to Billie

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Angeline had 70 more chocolates than Billie, represented as x = y + 70. After giving 20% of her chocolates to Billie, the equation y + 0.2x = 0.8x + 20 describes their new totals. By substituting y from the first equation into the second, we find x - 70 = 0.6x + 20. Solving this gives x = 90, meaning Angeline originally had 90 chocolates. Consequently, Angeline gave Billie 18 chocolates, as 20% of 90 is 18.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Angeline and Billie shared some chocolates. Angeline had 70 more chocolates than Billie. After Angeline gave 20% of her sweets to Billie, Billie had 20 more chocolates than Angeline. How many chocolates did Angeline give to Billie?

(This is another word problem that can be approached by the model method...(Nod))
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That looks like a pretty standard "algebra" problem. Let x be the number of chocolates Angeline had and let y be the number of chocolates Billy had.

" Angeline had 70 more chocolates than Billie."
x= y+ 70 or y=x- 70.

" After Angeline gave 20% of her sweets to Billie, Billie had 20 more chocolates than Angeline."
20% of Angeline's sweets is 0.2x. After Angeline gives them to Billie she has x- 0.2x= 0.8x and Billie has y+ 0.2x sweets. y+ 0.2x= 0.8x+ 20. Subtract 0.2x from both sides to get y= 0.6x+ 20.

We have both y= x- 70 and y= 0.6x+ 20 so x- 70= 0.6x+ 20.

Solve that for x." How many chocolates did Angeline give to Billie?"
Multiply x by 0.2.
 
[TIKZ]
\draw (0,0) rectangle (2,1);
\draw (-8,0) rectangle (0,1);
\draw [<->] (-8, 1.4) -- (0.8, 1.4);
\node at (-3,1.6) {\small 4 units};
\draw [<->] (0, 1.2) -- (2, 1.2);
\node at (1,1.8) {\small 70 chocolates};
\node at (0.4,0.4) {\tiny 1 part};
\node at (1.4,0.4) {\tiny 1 unit};
\draw[thick, dotted] (0.8, 0) -- (0.8, 1);
\node at (-8.6,0.5) {\small A};
\node at (-8.6,-1) {\small B};
\draw (-8,-1.5) rectangle (0,-0.5);
\draw (0,-1.5) rectangle (1.2,-0.5);
\draw[thick, dotted] (0.8, -1.5) -- (0.8, -0.5);
\node at (0.4,-1) {\tiny 1 part};
\node at (1,-1) {\tiny 20};
\draw[very thick, dotted,green] (0,-1.5) rectangle (1.2,-0.5);
\draw[ultra thick, dotted,green] (0,-1.5) rectangle (1.2,-0.5);
\draw[ultra thick, dotted,green] (0.8,0) rectangle (2,1);
\draw[gray, thick, - >] (2.1,0.5) -- (2.2,0.5) -- (2.2,-1) -- (1.3,-1);
\draw [<->] (0,-1.7) rectangle (1.2,-1.7);
\node at (0.7,-1.85) {\tiny 1 unit};
[/TIKZ]

We are looking for the value of 1 unit.

$\begin{align*} 1 \text{ part}+1 \text{ unit}&=70\\1 \text{ part} +20&=1 \text{ unit}\\1 \text{ unit} -20&=70-1 \text{ unit}\\ 2 \text{ units}&=90\\ \therefore 1 \text{ unit}&=45\end{align*}$
 
That would be better if you had said what "one unit" and "one part" are in terms of numbers of chocolates.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top