- #1
russ_watters said:There are certain things about carbon and water that make them uniquely suited for complex chemical reactions to take place in. That's why it is expected that they are required for life. Also, even if there is something we haven't thought of, the fact that we haven't thought of it also means we wouldn't know how to look for it! So we may as well just stick with what we know.
And I think when people say "technologically advanced" in this context, they generally mean advanced enough to be able to detect from a great distance. This requires things like artificial lights, radio, certain artificial chemicals in the atmosphere, etc.
Via what chemical reaction would methane provide energy to these species?keinve said:there might be a species that is dependent on a natural gas that is poisonous to us.
Right, but then we're just fantasizing. At the risk of being facetious, one might as well look for unicorns.keinve said:who knows? they may have a biology that is dependent on methane. besides, it might not be just methane. carbon dioxide, over a long period of time with no oxygen, can be deadly.
Chemists know exactly what chemical reactions with methane produce energy. I'll give you a hint: the simplest ones use some form of oxygen. That's kinda the point here. We already know what the likely chemical bases of life are. There are only so many elements and so many natural compounds. Certain ones have specific properties that make them ideally suited for harboring life.keinve said:who knows?
Early in the Earth's evolution, carbon dioxide was predominant and oxygen was poisonous. Plants, of course, breathe in carbon dioxide and expunge oxygen. But there is good reason why animals evolved to breathe oxygen (carbon dioxide producing reactions don't produce enough energy to support animals).carbon dioxide, over a long period of time with no oxygen, can be deadly.
It is also worth pointing out that just because we aren't looking for unicorns, that doesn't mean we wouldn't recognize them if we saw them. So there really isn't any downside to a focused approach to our search.DaveC426913 said:Right, but then we're just fantasizing. At the risk of being facetious, one might as well look for unicorns.
As of 2021, over 4,500 exoplanets have been confirmed, but only a handful have shown potential signs of an atmospheric oxygen signature. This is due to the difficulty in detecting and confirming the presence of oxygen on distant exoplanets.
While the presence of oxygen is a key indicator of potential habitability, it is not the only requirement for life to exist. Other factors such as the presence of liquid water, a stable atmosphere, and a suitable distance from its host star also play important roles. Therefore, there is no definite number of exoplanets with oxygen signatures that would guarantee the existence of extraterrestrial life.
The presence of oxygen in an exoplanet's atmosphere can indicate the presence of photosynthetic organisms, which are crucial for complex life forms to develop. By detecting atmospheric oxygen, scientists can narrow down their search for potentially habitable exoplanets and focus on studying them further.
Scientists use a technique called spectroscopy to measure the composition of an exoplanet's atmosphere. This involves studying the light that passes through the exoplanet's atmosphere and identifying any absorption lines that are characteristic of oxygen. This method requires advanced technology and can be challenging, but it has been successfully used to detect atmospheric oxygen on distant exoplanets.
Yes, there are several limitations to detecting atmospheric oxygen on exoplanets. One major limitation is the distance of the exoplanet from Earth, as it can be difficult to obtain clear and accurate readings from a distant planet. Another limitation is the presence of clouds or other atmospheric conditions that can interfere with the spectroscopic measurements. Additionally, not all forms of life on other planets may produce oxygen, making it a less reliable indicator of habitability in some cases.