How Many Functions Meet the Fixed Point Criterion?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the number of functions \( f:\{1,2,3,4,5\}\rightarrow \{1,2,3,4,5\} \) that satisfy the condition \( f(i)=i \) for at least one \( i \). The total number of functions is \( 5^5 \), while the number of functions where \( f(i) \neq i \) for all \( i \) is \( 4^5 \). Thus, the number of functions meeting the criterion is calculated as \( 5^5 - 4^5 = 2101 \). The discussion also touches on the distinction between "into" and "onto" functions, clarifying that "into" functions do not cover the entire codomain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial functions
  • Familiarity with permutations and derangements
  • Knowledge of the inclusion-exclusion principle
  • Basic concepts of function mapping in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of derangements in combinatorics
  • Learn about the inclusion-exclusion principle in detail
  • Explore the definitions and differences between "into" and "onto" functions
  • Practice problems involving permutations and combinations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying combinatorics, educators teaching function theory, and anyone interested in advanced counting techniques.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:
Let $f:\{1,2,3,4,5\}\rightarrow \{1,2,3,4,5\}$, then the number of functions which are into and satisfy $f(i)=i$ for at least one $i=1,2,3,4,5$ are

A)435
B)2121
C)2025
D)None of these

Attempt:
Looking at the opposite case i.e where $f(i)=i$ for at least one of the given i's is not satisfied, I can find the number of derangements but I am not sure if it helps. I need a few hints to begin with. My mind goes blank on these combinatorics problems. (Doh)

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keyword : Derangement function.

Count the number of permutations (this is just $5!$) and then exclude the derangement.
 
mathbalarka said:
Keyword : Derangement function.

Count the number of permutations (this is just $5!$) and then exclude the derangement.

Hi mathbalarka! :)

I am not sure but number of possible functions are $5^5$ or perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by the number of permutations.

The derangement is $!5=44$.

Thanks!
 
Pranav said:
I am not sure but number of possible functions are $5^5$

Then we are talking of different things. Is $f(\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}) = \{2, 2, 2, 2, 2\}$ allowed?
 
mathbalarka said:
Then we are talking of different things. Is $f(\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}) = \{2, 2, 2, 2, 2\}$ allowed?

Yes.
 
Pranav said:
Yes.

Then you are obviously correct.
 
mathbalarka said:
Then you are obviously correct.

?

I still have no idea about approaching this problem. :(
 
Neither do I. This new interpretation seems harder than mine.
 
Pranav said:
Problem:
Let $f:\{1,2,3,4,5\}\rightarrow \{1,2,3,4,5\}$, then the number of functions which are into and satisfy $f(i)=i$ for at least one $i=1,2,3,4,5$ are

A)435
B)2121
C)2025
D)None of these

Attempt:
Looking at the opposite case i.e where $f(i)=i$ for at least one of the given i's is not satisfied, I can find the number of derangements but I am not sure if it helps. I need a few hints to begin with. My mind goes blank on these combinatorics problems. (Doh)

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

Hey Pranav! :)

Let's indeed look at the opposite case, where $f(i) \ne i$ for each $i$.
Then $1$ can be mapped to 4 possible numbers and so can any of the other numbers.
Therefore the opposite case contains $4^5$ functions.
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Hey Pranav! :)

Let's indeed look at the opposite case, where $f(i) \ne i$ for each $i$.
Then $1$ can be mapped to 4 possible numbers and so can any of the other numbers.
Therefore the opposite case contains $4^5$ functions.

Hi ILS! :)

Yes, agreed, so the total number of functions where $f(i)=i$ for at least one $i$ are $5^5-4^5=2101$. This brings me close to option C. Since I need the into functions, I have to subtract the onto ones but how should I do it? :confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Pranav said:
Yes, agreed, so the total number of functions where $f(i)=i$ for at least one $i$ are $5^5-4^5=2101$. This brings me close to option C. Since I need the into functions, I have to subtract the onto ones but how should I do it? :confused:
I think that there is a typo in the question. I thinkm 2101 is correct.
Using inclusion/exclusion I get \sum\limits_{k = 1}^5 {{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{k + 1}}\binom{5}{k}{{\left( 5 \right)}^{5 - k}}} = 2101. See here
 
  • #12
Sorry for the late reply. :o

Plato said:
I think that there is a typo in the question. I thinkm 2101 is correct.
Using inclusion/exclusion I get \sum\limits_{k = 1}^5 {{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{k + 1}}\binom{5}{k}{{\left( 5 \right)}^{5 - k}}} = 2101. See here

Hi Plato!

I found the number of functions where $f(i)=i$ for at least one $i$ by $5^5-4^5=2101$ but I don't see how it deals with the into functions. I mean there can be onto functions too in these 2101 functions. How do I eliminate those? :confused: :confused:

Please help, I have got a mindblock here. (Sweating)
 
  • #13
Pranav said:
I found the number of functions where $f(i)=i$ for at least one $i$ by $5^5-4^5=2101$ but I don't see how it deals with the into functions. I mean there can be onto functions too in these 2101 functions. How do I eliminate those?

That is a matter of vocabulary. If f:A\to B it is easy to find text material says the f maps A into B..

On the other hand, to say f is onto means that f(A)=B.

I am not saying that there is no author who uses into in some special way. I am just saying that I am not aware of such.

To see what I mean look at this.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Plato said:
That is a matter of vocabulary. If f:A\to B it is easy to find text material says the f maps A into B..

On the other hand, to say f is onto means that f(A)=B.

I am not saying that there is no author who uses into in some special way. I am just saying that I am not aware of such.

To see what I mean look at this.

Thank you Plato! I just saw my textbook and yes, there is really no special use of "into".

I remember my teacher saying that into functions are those where range is not equal to co-domain but I am unable find this definition anywhere, I will have to talk about this to my teacher. Thank you once again Plato. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K