How much does a person weigh on Mount Everest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter droopster
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A person with a mass of 68 kg weighs 668 Newtons at sea level and 664 Newtons at the summit of Mount Everest, which is 8,488 meters above sea level. The weight difference is due to the decrease in gravitational force at higher altitudes, calculated using Newton's universal law of gravitation, F = GMm/r². The radius used in the calculations is the Earth's radius adjusted for altitude. The gravitational field strength decreases as one moves away from the Earth's center, affecting weight measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of gravitation (F = GMm/r²)
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational field strength (g)
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass and weight (F = mg)
  • Familiarity with concepts of altitude and its effect on gravitational force
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to calculate weight changes at different altitudes using gravitational formulas
  • Learn about the Earth's radius and how it affects gravitational calculations
  • Explore the implications of altitude on gravitational force in physics
  • Study the differences between mass and weight in various gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in the effects of altitude on weight measurements.

droopster
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a person has a mass of 68kg, how much does he weigh on the top of mount everest (8488km above sea level?
Given: m=68kg, d=8488m

Homework Equations



F = (G(m1)(m2)) / r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried figuring out the new radius. Once i get the radius i enter all the data and rearrange the formula to get m2 by itself.
Fr^2/Gm1 = m2

My problem is getting the new radius.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the "old" radius?
 
D H said:
What's the "old" radius?

Sorry, the old radius is the basic radius in the original formula. Its just r^2. But since I am dealing with a new altitude doesn't it change?
 
You didn't understand my question. I'll take another tack. How much does the person weigh at sea level? Why?
 
D H said:
You didn't understand my question. I'll take another tack. How much does the person weigh at sea level? Why?

He weighs 668N at sea level. Why? Well His mass multiplied by gravity gives me the weight.
 
What about Newton's law of gravity? Does that not apply at sea level?
 
D H said:
What about Newton's law of gravity? Does that not apply at sea level?

As long as an object is at or near the surface of the celestial object and we know the value of g the gravitational field strength at the surface of the celestial body, we can use F= mg to find the weight of the object
 
Newton's universal law of gravitation, F=GMm/r2, is not called universal just on a whim.

In other words, it applies at sea level as well as atop Mt. Everest.
 
D H said:
Newton's universal law of gravitation, F=GMm/r2, is not called universal just on a whim.

In other words, it applies at sea level as well as atop Mt. Everest.

But the answers are different. My answer book tells me that the weight on the surface of the Earth is 668 Newtons and 664 Newtons on mount Everest.
 
  • #10
Whoops, was i not supposed to read that xD?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
No, you were not supposed to see that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K