How much force can a truck seat back cushion absorb during a collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the force absorption capabilities of a truck seat back cushion during a collision, specifically comparing two trucks with weights around 5,700 lbs. The user calculates the impact force from one truck hitting another at speeds of 45-55 mph, resulting in significant force values. However, the forum participants emphasize the limitations of providing accurate assessments without complete information and certification. They advise consulting a local certified expert for reliable insights. Consequently, the thread is closed due to the inability to address real-life accident scenarios effectively.
MantisShrimp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I do not know much about this, please help.
My truck seat back cushion is 2" thick. Truck A is ~5,700 lbs from google. 2011 f-150 super cab 6.5ft bed.
Truck B is ~5775. 2015 GMC Yukon xl slt.
If truck A is stopped and braked and truck B hits truck A going 45-55mph creating a force of 52,695.8758604 N- 64,406.07049606 N or 11,846.503133255 lbf -14,479.059385089lbf.
I am not sure what density the foam is but how much does it take away in force? I hope this makes sense. I will do my best to answer any questions.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am afraid we cannot answer questions that look like a real-life accident. This has several reasons:
  • We do not have all the information.
  • We are not certified in any way and our comments would be of no legal value.
  • We cannot even verify the data.
  • It is impossible to provide a necessary description on the internet.
If you want a reliable comment then please contact a local certified expert who can directly inspect the situation.

This thread will be closed.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top