How Much Force Does a Gunshot Exert in Movie Scenes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zachwad47
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted on an average-weight man from a gunshot and the resulting motion based on kinetic energy values derived from a movie scene. The kinetic energy of Harry's .44 round is approximately 900 joules, while the baddie's shotgun blast is about 3300 joules, leading to a total energy transfer of around 4300 joules. The key takeaway is that kinetic energy is not conserved in this scenario, and the impulse formula F*Δt = m*Δv is essential for determining the force exerted on the bullet and consequently on the shooter. Conservation of momentum is also crucial for understanding the backward motion of the shooter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Third Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with the impulse-momentum theorem
  • Basic knowledge of kinetic energy calculations
  • Concept of conservation of momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impulse-momentum theorem in detail
  • Learn about conservation of momentum in collision scenarios
  • Explore the effects of explosive exit wounds on body motion
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration using F=ma
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the realistic portrayal of physics in film, particularly in relation to gun mechanics and motion dynamics.

zachwad47
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Trying to find the total force felt by an average-weight man from his own gunshot plus a bullet incident on him, assuming negligible air resistance, static friction force, force lost to penetration, etc, based on the movie clip at . Have already calculated kinetic energy due to Harry's .44 round as appr 900 joules and that equal-and-opposite due to the baddie's shotgun blast as about 3300 joules, based on projectile weights of about .021 and .028 kg (.44 and shotgun) moving at around 300 and 490 m/s, respectively. This is giving me a total force felt (assuming negligible outside factors/energy loss and a totally elastic energy transfer) by the baddie of about 4300 joules... but from here, I am having a really hard time translating this to force or how much distance he *should* be thrown back. I have heard explanations about these sort of unrealistic gun knockbacks before and understand that the total force felt should never be enough to actually move an average-sized person any sizable distance (or the shooter EAO), but assuming a complete transfer of energy I am getting an output velocity which is even more unrealistic than the movie. I know I'm going wrong somewhere very simple but can't put my finger on it. Help!

Also guesstimating that he is knocked about 2m backwards over a 1s period...

Homework Equations


For Ek, f=ma, etc

The Attempt at a Solution



As above -- getting stuck!
Thanks for any advice you could give. This is what we midwesterners call a "brain fart"... I totally know how to do this but its just not coming to me. Do I have to apply a force only to a small bullet-sized area (again, assuming no penetration for simplicity's sake)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Zach.
Just a couple of tips:
First, kinetic energy is not very helpful in finding the force. Certainly KE is not conserved in this situation.
The impulse formula F*Δt = m*Δv is probably your best bet. If you can find the change in velocity of the bullet in the gun and the time for the bullet to leave the gun, you will be able to find the force on bullet. The force on the bullet is the same as the force on the gun&man (Newton's 3rd law).

If you want to go straight to the backward speed of the gun and shooter, you might use conservation of momentum (initially zero).
p before = p after
0 = mv of bullet + mv of man&gun
 
As a matter of interest, bullet kinetic energy can be an important factor in the motion of the body if there is an explosive exit wound. This can actually cause the body to recoil (in the direction from which the bullet came - ie backward) with greater backward momentum than the forward momentum that the bullet was carrying. But in this case Delphi is correct: you have to apply conservation of momentum.

AM
 
Thanks all! I knew it was something simple :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K