How Much Should the Spring Be Compressed to Keep the Mass on Track?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamest39
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 50-gram mass accelerated by a compressed spring (k = 1800 N/m) on a frictionless loop of radius 0.324 m. The goal is to determine the minimum compression of the spring required for the mass to maintain contact with the track at the top of the loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the potential energy of the spring and its relationship to kinetic and gravitational potential energy at the top of the loop. There are questions about how to determine the force needed for the mass to achieve the required velocity and how to express the potential energy of the spring in terms of compression.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using energy conservation principles to relate the energies involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the necessary parameters and assumptions, including the height of the loop and the reference point for the spring's potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific distances between the spring and the loop, leading to assumptions about the initial conditions. There is also a mention of potential confusion regarding the energy equations and the correct formulation of the compression variable.

Jamest39
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 50-gram mass is accelerated from rest be a compressed spring (k = 1800 N/m), sending it on a journey along a frictionless loop-de-loop of radius 0.324 m. What minimum amount of initial compression of the spring is required if the mass is to remain in contact with the track at the top of the loop?

Homework Equations


centripetal acceleration = (v^2)/r
F = ma
F = kx (Hooke's Law)

The Attempt at a Solution


The velocity required at the top of the loop:
v = sqrt( 9.80m/s^2 * 0.324 m) = 1.782 m/s
Since the spring constant k is already known, we'd just need to determine F and use Hooke's Law to solve for x. But I can't figure out how to determine the force required to make push that mass and give it that velocity at the top of the loop.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think about using the potential energy of the spring, 1/2 kx2. That amount should be equal to the kinetic energy for the speed you need added to the gravitational potential energy for a height equal to the diameter of the loop.
 
steven george said:
I would think about using the potential energy of the spring, 1/2 kx2. That amount should be equal to the kinetic energy for the speed you need added to the gravitational potential energy for a height equal to the diameter of the loop.

So the gravitational potential energy is just mgh = (0.05 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.648m)
But how can I solve for the potential energy of the spring without x (the amount of compression)?
 
I have looked through your OP and I will show you how to find X. But before I tell you, have you learned popential energy and kinetic energy ? I don't want to write down an answer without your understanding.
 
And does your homework provide the distance between the spring and the loop - de - loop ( sound like french)
 
The Vinh said:
And does your homework provide the distance between the spring and the loop - de - loop ( sound like french)

yes, we learned about it, I have the formulas for kinetic and potential energy. And it does not provide any distance, so I guess we can assume it starts right on the circle?
 
Sound good, in order to let the substance remain contact with the track at the top of loop - de - loop, centripetal acceleration must be greater than gravity, Ac >= G. It means that V^2 = gr.
+) Frame of reference is the ground
+) 1/2V^2 + mg2r = 1/2Vo^2 => Vo^2 = gr + 2g2r
+) you use the conservation of energy: 1/2kx^2 = 1/2mVo^2 => you can find X ( i have to let you do the rest )
 
For the spring, i choose the original length as frame of reference
 
The Vinh said:
For the spring, i choose the original length as frame of reference

So then, using those, we would get:
x = sqrt( (10mgr)/k )
 
  • #10
Jamest39 said:
So then, using those, we would get:
x = sqrt( (10mgr)/k )
That's right. And are you learning Pascal programming language ? because i saw sqrt()
 
  • #11
Oh i am sorry, your answer wasn't right. x = sqrt((5mgr)/k)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamest39
  • #12
The Vinh said:
Oh i am sorry, your answer wasn't right. x = sqrt((5mgr)/k)
Ah, I see. I dropped one of the 1/2 while working through it. Thanks!
And I'm not learning that programming language, that's just how I have to enter in square roots on my online math homework.
 
  • #13
Jamest39 said:
Ah, I see. I dropped one of the 1/2 while working through it. Thanks!
And I'm not learning that programming language, that's just how I have to enter in square roots on my online math homework.
I see
 
  • #14
Jamest39 said:
So the gravitational potential energy is just mgh = (0.05 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.648m)
But how can I solve for the potential energy of the spring without x (the amount of compression)?

If you know how much potential energy it has at the top, as you have described then just add the kinetic energy for the speed that you have already calculated. That will give you the total amount of energy. All of that energy comes from the potential energy of the spring so the total energy is equal to the elastic potential energy and "x" is the only thing that you don't know in the equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K