How much time sciencists spending on math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fermio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the amount of time scientists, particularly in physics and mathematics, dedicate to their fields. Participants explore the relationship between mathematics and physics, the nature of mathematical work in these disciplines, and personal experiences with mathematical coursework.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to be a good scientist in physics or math, one must work long hours, potentially over 10 hours a day.
  • Another participant asserts that math is the language of physics and that good physicists are excellent mathematicians.
  • A first-year physics graduate student shares their experience, noting that while they spend a lot of time on mathematics, it often involves practical applications like algebra and programming rather than theoretical proofs.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the necessity of being an excellent mathematician, arguing that basic math skills like algebra and calculus are sufficient for physics.
  • One participant contrasts the depth of knowledge between mathematicians and physicists, stating that mathematicians have a deeper understanding of fewer areas, while physicists have a broader but shallower knowledge of many mathematical areas.
  • Another participant mentions their struggle with partial derivatives and complex integrals, indicating that they find advanced mathematics challenging.
  • One participant reflects on their difficulties learning physics and quantum mechanics, suggesting that practical experience may be more beneficial than theoretical study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of extensive mathematical knowledge for physicists, with some arguing that basic math suffices while others emphasize the importance of being proficient in mathematics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact relationship between mathematics and physics and the time commitment required for success in these fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants' claims about the nature of mathematical work in physics and the required level of mathematical proficiency are based on personal experiences and may not represent a consensus. There are also varying definitions of what constitutes "real" mathematics.

fermio
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
What part of live is for math or physics for sciensists? I think need work all day (10 hours or more) if you want to be a good sciencists of physics or math or good lecturer. Do I right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Math is the language of physics. All good physicists are excellent mathematicians.
 
Here's my experience as a first year physics grad student who majored in math:

Math and physics most certainly aren't the same thing, and the answer to your question depends on what you mean by "math." In my coursework and research, I spend a lot of time doing mathematics. But most of this involves doing a lot of algebra, taking derivatives, writing programs, etc. In my math courses as an undergrad, there was very little computation, and very many proofs. Honestly it felt like being an English or philosophy major at times. Real mathematics doesn't involve as much computation as physics

To be a physicist you need to be excellent at "basic" math like algebra and calculus, which I think is what Chronos was getting at. But it's OK if you don't know the difference between a field and a ring.
 
Chronos said:
Math is the language of physics. All good physicists are excellent mathematicians.

Eh? I hope not. I haven't done any real upper-division math. Diff EQ's, Partial derivatives, vector calculus, linear algebra, some real and complex analysis in my math physics class. That's about it. I wouldn't consider that being an excellent mathematician.

Not compared to what my math major friends are doing.
 
Poop-Loops said:
Eh? I hope not. I haven't done any real upper-division math. Diff EQ's, Partial derivatives, vector calculus, linear algebra, some real and complex analysis in my math physics class. That's about it. I wouldn't consider that being an excellent mathematician.

Not compared to what my math major friends are doing.

If you have some experience with this, then you should be fine for physics. The only upper division math I've ever used in my graduate physics classes is complex analysis, and even then it was only twice. If you know linear algebra, diff eq, and vector calculus, that's pretty much all you need. Any math you need for specialized topics, you'll probably learn on the fly.
 
Im taking PDEs right now, and its going to be rough. Its been a long time since my last math class.
 
Poop-Loops said:
Eh? I hope not. I haven't done any real upper-division math. Diff EQ's, Partial derivatives, vector calculus, linear algebra, some real and complex analysis in my math physics class. That's about it. I wouldn't consider that being an excellent mathematician.

Not compared to what my math major friends are doing.

I like to use the following example to explain the difference between a math and physics majors knowledge of math:

A mathematician is VERY well versed in a smaller area of mathematics, knowing all the in and outs, all the tricks, and knows where everything comes from.

A physicist, on the other hand, has knowledge of many different areas of math, though their knowledge of anyone area of math is usually much shallowing than that of a mathematician who specializes in any of those areas. A physicist will know enough about the area to use the mathematical tools from that area effectively and efficiently.
 
I think, that if your profesion is matehematics or good physics then need very hard work and spend for it much time and much think and practicicate. I enough good understand derivatives, integrals, but harder integrals is pretty hard to me. Partial derivative in many hard combinations f(x, y) is also almost unclear and very hard and two or 3 integrals at one time also very hard, so it's hard to me to understood how profesrors can handle it. So I think math and physics and also programing, computers is the hardest science, but which giving the biggest benefit for humans... Also I was trying to learn physics, but by trying learn physics I almost nothing to learn and to try somthing learn of physics is just like Donkihot fighting with millhouses. For physics learning perhaps is more important practic. Also was trying learn quantum mechanics and almost nothing learn, maybe my physics books bad...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K