How photon entanglement works?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanisms of photon entanglement, particularly through the process of Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion (SPDC). Participants explore the theoretical and experimental aspects of entanglement, including its implications and the CHSH inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the feasibility of entangling photons and whether it is merely theoretical.
  • Others explain that photons can be entangled using SPDC, where a higher energy photon splits into two lower energy photons under specific conditions.
  • One participant mentions that numerous experiments have demonstrated entanglement by violating the Bell/CHSH inequality, suggesting that it is accepted by most of the scientific community, though some remain skeptical.
  • A detailed explanation of SPDC is provided, including conservation of energy and momentum, and how the design of nonlinear crystals can lead to entangled states with specific polarizations.
  • Participants discuss the CHSH inequality, noting its assumptions about locality and realism, and how certain quantum states can violate this inequality, indicating potential flaws in those assumptions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the understanding of photon entanglement and the implications of the CHSH inequality. While some participants provide explanations and affirm the existence of entanglement, others express confusion and seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the technical details of SPDC and the CHSH inequality, indicating that further elaboration may be necessary for complete comprehension.

Natko
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
How do you get photos to become entangled? And is this even possible, or just a theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons are usually entangled using SPDC (Spontaneous Parametric Down conversion), in which basically a photon of higher energy is split into 2 photons of lower energies using a non-linear crystal. The photons are entangled under certain conditions. You can check wikipedia about this.

There have been lot of experiments to violate Bell/CHSH inequality starting from the one by Alain Aspect. All of these prove the presence of entanglement by separating the particles over larger and larger distance. So it is not just a theory (at least for most of the scientific community although there are still some who doubt it).
 
Wolfgang2b said:
Photons are usually entangled using SPDC (Spontaneous Parametric Down conversion), in which basically a photon of higher energy is split into 2 photons of lower energies using a non-linear crystal. The photons are entangled under certain conditions. You can check wikipedia about this.

There have been lot of experiments to violate Bell/CHSH inequality starting from the one by Alain Aspect. All of these prove the presence of entanglement by separating the particles over larger and larger distance. So it is not just a theory (at least for most of the scientific community although there are still some who doubt it).

Can you explain how photons can get entangled by SPDC, as well as the CHSH inequality? I cannot understand the Wikipedia explanation.
 
SPDC: A high energy photon traveling through certain kinds of nonlinear materials can split into two lower energy photons. This would mean that a blue photon (high energy) could split into two red photons (low energy). In this process, just like in classical physics, energy and momentum must both be conserved (mostly). If you only consider the case where the two red photons are both half the energy of the blue photon, then you can mostly consider the conservation of momentum part. You can design your nonlinear crystal in such a way that you take advantage of the required momentum conservation to force one of the red photons to be polarized in the same direction as the blue photon (we'll say V for vertically polarized) and the other to be polarized in the orthogonal direction (H for horizontal). Also, if you so choose, you can design it such that the photons move away from each other, in order to conserve momentum. Thus, if one photon goes right, the other goes left. In designing the crystal, you take advantage of what is called anisotropy, which means that the index of refraction is different for different polarizations. The final step is to realize that each photon, going left or right, can have either polarization, as long as the other photon has the other polarization. But which photon has which polarization is not determined until you do your measurement. The pair of photons is thus in the state |H,V> + |V,H>, which is an entangled state.

CHSH: CHSH is a revision of the Bell inequality. It technically has nothing to do with quantum mechanics (although it is pretty much always discussed in this context), it is just a contrived inequality that has two assumptions: that space is both real and local. If those assumptions are true, then the inequality must always be less than 2. There are certain types of quantum states (producible by SPDC, among other things) that violate that inequality and thus show that one of the assumptions is false. I suggest you concentrate on the interesting philosophical implications of this, and not the form or derivation of the inequality itself. It is not trivial and is also not terribly satisfying once you work it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
766
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K