How Quickly Can an Eagle Distinguish Two Mice as Separate Objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlax31
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in optics and animal physiology, specifically focusing on how an eagle perceives two mice as separate objects based on their distance and the eagle's visual resolution capabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the angular separation of the mice and the eagle's resolution limit, with attempts to calculate the distance at which the eagle can distinguish the two objects. Questions arise regarding the accuracy of initial calculations and the implications of the wavelength of light in different media.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing alternative approaches and questioning the assumptions made in the calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of considering the medium in which the eagle is observing the mice.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential rounding errors in calculations and the significance of the light's wavelength being specified in a vacuum, suggesting that this may affect the outcome when considering the problem in air.

jlax31
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I'm little stumped on this question. Have tried multiple times and can not find the right answer to it. Here it is:

1. Question

The pupil of an eagle's eye has a diameter of 5.93 mm. Two field mice are separated by 0.0124 m. From a distance of 186 m, the eagle sees them as one unresolved object and dives toward them at a speed of 18.1 m/s. Assume that the eagle's eye detects light that has a wavelength of 565 nm in a vacuum. How much time passes until the eagle sees the mice as separate objects?




3. The Attempt at a Solution

565e-9/5.93e-3 = 9.527824620573355e-5 or approx 1.00x 10^-4 which is the resolving angle
.0124/186 = 6.666666666666667e-5 which is approx 2/3 of resolving angle (this is angle when eagle starts)

if taking 2/3 of 186m I get 124.

124m / 18.1 m/s = 6.85s


However, the answer is wrong. Any advice/help/etc.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you just solve for the distance at which the angular separation of the mice is equal to the resolution limit?

(0.0124 m)/(d) = (565 nm)/(5.93 mm)

Solve for d.

Your approach was fine, and equivalent, except that you introduced a huge rounding error by rounding that first angle up.
 
I actually had 7.19s as my first answer which is what you get when you solve for d. This answer is apparently wrong though.. :confused:
 
jlax31 said:
I actually had 7.19s as my first answer which is what you get when you solve for d. This answer is apparently wrong though.. :confused:

Hopefully you realized that your method and "solving for d" are not actually different methods. It's just that your ratio should have been closer to 0.7 rather than 0.667 --- an error that was due to rounding.

In any case, as for why you are getting the wrong answer still: the only think that I can think of is that the problem explicitly mentions that 565 nm is the vacuum wavelength of the light that the eagle is sensitive to. But the eagle and the mice are not in a vacuum. I don't know why else this information would have been specified in the first place, if not so that you could convert this to the wavelength in the appropriate medium (in this case air).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
19K