How relevant is the Feynman's Lectures on Physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mrhoneycinnamo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lectures Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Feynman's Lectures on Physics (FLP) remain relevant due to their foundational insights into physics and problem-solving techniques. Despite being published decades ago, the principles of quantum mechanics discussed in FLP continue to hold validity. The text has not been modified to reflect newer discoveries; it remains untouched since its original publication. This enduring relevance highlights the importance of FLP in understanding both classical and modern physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with classical physics concepts
  • Basic knowledge of problem-solving in physics
  • Ability to analyze historical scientific texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the latest advancements in quantum mechanics
  • Read supplementary materials on modern physics theories
  • Investigate the historical context of Feynman's work
  • Engage with online discussions about the relevance of classical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of physics and their application in modern scientific discussions.

mrhoneycinnamo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,so I've just started reading the Feynman's Lectures on Physics on my own recently.By the end of chapter 2, volume 1, it says "This then, is the horrible condition of our physics today.To summarise it, I would say this:outside the nucleus, we seem to know all; inside it,quantum mechanics is valid--the principles of quantum mechanics have not been found to fail...but we really do not know how far we have yet to go in this task.". Here I can't help but keep wondering how many things we STILL do not know as time progressed since Feynman said it. I know the FLP was first published many years ago(i don't know when) and things may have changed since then.Do they modify the FLP according to our new knowledge or do they keep FLP untouched just like the first copy?Can anyone tell me please?:confused:

PS: pardon my poor english, i am not a native english speaker
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks for your reply!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
24K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K