hitssquad
- 926
- 0
I like subtlety, so I like it dark and rich the way it is now. The extroverts might want it brightened.honestrosewater said:Do I need to brighten it or such?
The discussion revolves around selecting an appropriate avatar image that maintains quality and visual appeal when scaled down to small sizes, specifically 64x64 pixels. Participants explore various image options, including personal photographs, artwork, and symbolic representations, while considering factors such as texture, detail, and personal significance.
There is no clear consensus on which avatar option is best, as participants express differing preferences and opinions on the suitability of various images. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the ideal choice for an avatar.
Participants highlight the limitations of certain images when scaled down, particularly regarding composition and detail retention. The discussion also reflects personal interpretations of what an avatar should represent.
I like subtlety, so I like it dark and rich the way it is now. The extroverts might want it brightened.honestrosewater said:Do I need to brighten it or such?
I thought it was some weird statue. Now it just makes me sad.hitssquad said:Not a beaver. Leave it to Fetus.
![]()
I think you did a good job of selecting the brightest elements of the picture, so no need to brighten it.honestrosewater said:Surprise! I couldn't do anything with Gw/PE.I may try later, but I really like this one. What do you think? Do I need to brighten it or such?
[/URL]hitssquad said:I guess I should associate you with cows, then.
http://www.sonomacows.com/assets/images/logo456.jpg