How Should I Structure My Senior Year Solid State Physics Term Paper?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around structuring a senior year term paper for a solid state physics course. Participants explore formatting options, the distinction between an abstract and a conclusion, and the nature of review papers versus scientific articles.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the structure of the term paper, particularly the roles of the abstract and conclusion, given the lack of experimental data.
  • Another participant suggests seeking clarification from the instructor, noting that paper formats can vary significantly between different schools and professors.
  • A participant raises a question about the difference between review papers and journal articles, indicating uncertainty about their respective formats and purposes.
  • A later reply defines review papers as summaries of recent progress in a field, contrasting them with scientific papers that focus on specific problems, and suggests they may be more accessible for students.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that seeking clarification from the instructor is important, but there is no consensus on the specific structure of the paper or the definitions of review papers versus scientific articles.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the expectations for the term paper format and the definitions of different types of academic papers, which may depend on specific academic contexts.

Arij
Messages
25
Reaction score
2
Hello every one,

End of terms papers always are weird and non natural for me. This is a senior class about solid state physics and we are asked to write a 5-10 pgs term paper on a certain topic.

My question is how do you go about formatting this kind of paper?
Abstract(??) -> introduction(little history/background) -> body(bunch of scientific facts and concepts) -> conclusion (??)

it's not like I did an experiment to write a conclusion about, and hence i get confused on what's the difference between an abstract and a conclusion and if i should be writing both in the first place!
btw, I didn't go to US schools and I was only introduced to writing papers in college and I only did it for couple of english classes and couple of physics classes, the idea of researching resources and constructing a paper based on them (like recycling informations? ) is very confusing to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To me it sounds like you need a little more information from your instructor. Paper formats will vary from school to school and professor to professor. If it's not blatantly clear from the assignment itself, you could go and talk to your professor about it during office hours, or send her or him an email to ask about specifics.

Failing that, you could read a few review papers on your topic of choice (which you'll probably have to do anyway) and follow the format used.
 
Choppy said:
To me it sounds like you need a little more information from your instructor. Paper formats will vary from school to school and professor to professor. If it's not blatantly clear from the assignment itself, you could go and talk to your professor about it during office hours, or send her or him an email to ask about specifics.

Failing that, you could read a few review papers on your topic of choice (which you'll probably have to do anyway) and follow the format used.

unfortunately I am very tight on time and I kind of missed my chance to ask.

are "review papers" the same as journal article? or is it more of a scientific paper/ thesis with an experiment or a data analysis (new question to answer) kind of paper?
 
A review paper is something that comes out in an academic journal that summarizes the recent progress in a field, underscores problems and may even attempt to discuss future avenues for research. They tend not to be as formal in their structure as a scientific paper, because scientific papers tend to focus on one particular problem (or set of particular problems). Usually they're a good place to start for senior undergraduate students interested in learning about a field or new graduates students because they can take a little more space up to explain the more common aspects of the field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K