How small does sub-atomic universe go?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ucf-fisher21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the fundamental nature of matter, specifically addressing whether particles such as electrons can be further subdivided. It is established that electrons are considered fundamental particles, acting as point particles with no internal structure, supported by experimental evidence. The conversation also touches on speculative theories regarding potential deeper levels of particles, such as "rishons" and "preons," though these have yet to yield experimentally verifiable predictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental particles, specifically electrons and quarks.
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and particle physics concepts.
  • Knowledge of experimental methods in physics.
  • Awareness of theoretical physics and speculative particle theories.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and behaviors of fundamental particles in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the theories of rishons and preons in particle physics.
  • Study experimental techniques used to test the structure of particles.
  • Investigate the implications of quantum behavior on the nature of matter.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental structure of matter and the ongoing debates in theoretical physics.

ucf-fisher21
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I was just wondering if humans have discovered the fundamental nature of matter (or energy). If not, could matter possibly be made up of an infinite regress of particles?

I've heard that quarks are what make up protons and nuetrons. What about electrons? Are they fundmental or can you break it down farther?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ucf-fisher21 said:
Hi everybody,

I was just wondering if humans have discovered the fundamental nature of matter (or energy). If not, could matter possibly be made up of an infinite regress of particles?

I've heard that quarks are what make up protons and nuetrons. What about electrons? Are they fundmental or can you break it down farther?

Electrons are fundamental. They act as point particles (no internal structure) based on experiments. So in this respect, theory and experiment currently agree. Electrons and other fundamental particles exhibit quantum behavior, which is a very strong indicator that there is no deeper level.

If you would like to postulate that there is a deeper level, you will need to come up with a theory that explains what goes on and how it can be tested to determine it is accurate.
 
DrChinese said:
Electrons are fundamental.

... as far as we know. (I know you know this; I just wanted to make it clear to the original poster. Everything we know is "as far as we know," so we tend to take it as implicit in everything we say.)

I'd like to add that some physicists have speculated about a possible next level of particles that would combine to form electrons, quarks, etc. Two names that come to my mind are "rishons" and "preons." But as far as I know, these speculations / theories haven't (yet) predicted anything new about particles that could be verified experimentally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
897
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K