How the heck do I integrate this?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yuiop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a second-order differential equation involving the variables r and t, specifically in the context of a physical problem. Participants are exploring methods to simplify and solve the equation, which contains a term involving dr/dt, and are seeking to express the solution solely in terms of r, t, and R.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about integrating the equation due to the presence of the dr/dt term and seeks a solution that eliminates all dr and dt variables.
  • Another participant suggests using substitutions, specifically letting dr/dt = p, which leads to a reformulation of the equation.
  • A participant provides a parametric equation from an external source and asks for hints on deriving it from the original equation.
  • Further suggestions involve manipulating the equation into a form that can be integrated, with emphasis on the relationship between p and x.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriateness of using indefinite versus definite integrals, with concerns raised about singularities at specific points in the integration process.
  • Participants question whether the parameter α in the parametric equation corresponds to the p = dr/dt introduced earlier.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to integrate the equation. Multiple methods and substitutions are proposed, but no single solution is agreed upon, and uncertainty remains regarding the integration process and the handling of singularities.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential singularity issues when integrating at specific values, such as x=0 and x=2m, which complicate the integration process. There is also uncertainty about the necessity of including constants of integration at different stages of the integration.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in advanced mathematical techniques for solving differential equations, particularly in physics contexts, as well as those seeking to understand the implications of parametric equations in relation to integration.

yuiop
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
20
Hi,

I am trying to find a solution for this equation in terms of r or t:

[tex]\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = \frac{m}{r(r-2m)}\left( \left( \frac{dr}{dt}\right)^2-\left(1-\frac{2m}{R}\right)\right)[/tex]

It seems I should integrate it twice with respect t, but I have no idea how to do that with a dr/dt term in the middle of the right hand side. I need to get rid of all dr and dt variables and obtain an answer that contains just r,t and R variables, if that is possible.

One possible (given) solution that I am not convinced is correct is:

[tex]t=\frac{R}{2}\sqrt{\frac{R}{2m}}\left(cos^{-1}\left(\frac{2r}{R}-1\right)+2\sqrt{\frac{r(R-r)}{R^2}}\right)[/tex]

but I have no idea how the solution was obtained.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the independent variable [itex]t[/itex] doesn't appear, try the substitutions [itex]dr/dt = p[/itex] and

[tex]\frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{dr}{dt} \frac{dp}{dr} = p \frac{dp}{dr}.[/tex]
 
Hi George,

I am still getting nowhere with this derivation and maybe you could provide some more hints?

Here is some some more info:

The equation that I am looking for the derivation of is actually given as a parametric equation

[tex]r = \frac{R}{2}(1+cos(\alpha)) , \tau = \frac{R}{2}\sqrt{\frac{R}{2m}}(\alpha+sin(\alpha))[/tex]

on this mathpages page http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-04/6-04.htm

and the equation it is derived from appears to be equation (5) on that page.

Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Putting aside the complicated coefficients, letting p= dx/dt as George Jones suggested,
the equation becomes pdp/dx= A(p2- B) which is equivalent to
[tex]\frac{p dp}{Ap^2- B}= dx[/tex] which is easy to integrate.
Once you have found p= dx/dt, integrate again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Putting aside the complicated coefficients, letting p= dx/dt as George Jones suggested,
the equation becomes pdp/dx= A(p2- B) which is equivalent to
[tex]\frac{p dp}{A(p^2- B)}= dx[/tex] which is easy to integrate.
Once you have found p= dx/dt, integrate again.

Is this on the right track?

[tex]p \frac{dp}{dx} = A(p^2-B)[/tex]

[tex]p^2 = \int{A(p^2-B)}dx = C[x,p][/tex]

where C[x,p] is some function of x and p.

Solve for p

[tex]p = D[x] = \frac{dx}{dt}[/tex] (assume t is shorthand for proper time tau)

[tex]x = \int{ D[x] } dt = E[x,t][/tex]

Solve for x or t

[tex]x = F[t][/tex] or [tex]t = G[x][/tex]


I also need to know if a indefinite integration is OK for the first integration or if a definite integration is more rigorous. When I try a definite integral

[tex]\int_{0}^{R} {A(p^2-B)} dx[/tex] or [tex]\int_{2m}^{R} {A(p^2-B)} dx[/tex]


the software complains about division by zero errors. Presumably that is singularity problems at x=0 and x=2m?

Should I allow for the constant of integration at the first integration or just add one in at the final integration?

I hope that makes some sort of sense. I am a bit out of my depth here and need all the help I can get from you guys ;)

P.S. I am aware some of these problems can be made a lot simpler if a parametric form can be found before integration. Is the parameter [itex]\alpha[/itex] in the mathpages parametric equation the same as the p = dr/dt introduced by George?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K