How the satellite parts get damaged

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter praveena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    parts Satellite
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of environmental factors, particularly gravitational forces and cosmic radiation, on the metal components of satellites and rovers, specifically in the context of their operation on celestial bodies like Mars and the Moon. Participants explore the potential for damage, wear and tear, and the implications of material choices in spacecraft design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the metal of a rover experiences force upon landing and if low gravity affects its appearance.
  • Another participant asserts that spacecraft are designed to handle their own weight and that radiation has a more significant impact on metal than gravity.
  • Concerns are raised about wear and tear on Mars rovers, with specific mention of 'Curiosity' developing holes in its wheels due to mechanical wear.
  • Participants discuss the risks of micrometeorite strikes during lunar landings and the thin metal skin of the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM).
  • There is a focus on how cosmic radiation affects electronics more than the metal surfaces of spacecraft, with one participant seeking clarification on the effects on metal itself.
  • Long-term effects of radiation on metal surfaces are mentioned, including the potential for charged metal to attract space dust and weld together over time.
  • Questions arise regarding the feasibility of using metal on spacecraft surfaces and whether it would be excluded from designs.
  • Space junk is identified as a current issue for Earth orbit missions, with references to the Long Duration Exposure Facility and its role in studying the effects of space debris.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of cosmic radiation versus gravitational forces on metal surfaces, and there is no consensus on the long-term effects of radiation on spacecraft materials. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of using metal in spacecraft design.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors such as mechanical wear, radiation effects, and the challenges posed by space debris, but these points are not fully resolved or agreed upon.

praveena
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Hai PF,
After a long time, I have again got a question now.The Mars rovers or other satellite body which is made of metal. My question is, when the rover or satellite land on the surface of Mars or moon does the metal experience any force on the body of the metal? Is there any posibility of change in the appearance of the metalsurface of the satellite due to low gravitational force or stress on the metal?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, the force produces it's weight, but anything designed to land on a surface has already been designed to handle it's own weight, likewise, things put in orbit are specifically designed for zero G. It has nothing to do with metal, the same would be true if it were made out of carbon nanotubes or anything else with mass.

Radiation affects metal more than gravity, the cosmic radiation from space is easily absorbed by the metal. It doesn't really have any effect on the body of the object, other than possibly charging it, but it seriously affects electronics, which is why they must be shielded.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
The Mars rovers have all experienced some amount of 'wear and tear', even though designed to keep this to a minimum.
'Curiosity' has developed a few holes and dents in it's wheels though not enough to be an immediate threat to it's mobility.
Sometimes it's driven in reverse to reduce the possibility of the problem getting worse.
It's simply mechanical wear and tear due to gravity and friction just as happens to vehicles on Earth.

A few decades ago Russia (or USSR then) sent probes to Venus, (just landers, not rovers).
Due to the unexpectedly harsh conditions at the surface all of them perished within an hour or so.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
One of the fears during the Lunar landings was that the skin metal of the LEM was so thin in places that even a micrometeorite strike would seriously compromise hull integrity .

There was no way to safeguard against this so the missions flew anyway based on the probability of a strike being acceptably low .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
Nidum said:
One of the fears during the Lunar landings was that the skin metal of the LEM was so thin in places that even a micrometeorite strike would seriously compromise hull integrity .

There was no way to safeguard against this so the missions flew anyway based on the probability of a strike being acceptably low .
what is known as LEM?
 
praveena said:
what is known as LEM?
Lunar Excursion Module.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
newjerseyrunner said:
Yes, the force produces it's weight, but anything designed to land on a surface has already been designed to handle it's own weight, likewise, things put in orbit are specifically designed for zero G. It has nothing to do with metal, the same would be true if it were made out of carbon nanotubes or anything else with mass.

Radiation affects metal more than gravity, the cosmic radiation from space is easily absorbed by the metal. It doesn't really have any effect on the body of the object, other than possibly charging it, but it seriously affects electronics, which is why they must be shielded.
You have mentioned that cosmic radiation effects are more damage than gravitational force? over radiation of cosmic radiation how it affects a metal?
 
The universe is filled with charged particles moving at very high speed (accelerate by massive magnetic fields.) The solar wind comes off of the sun at about a million miles an hour. These are charged and you know that they are charged because when they hit the Earth's magnetic field, they are funneled to our poles causing the northern and southern lights.

Computers require very consistent environments. If you shock a computer chip, it's electrons jump all over the place and it loses whatever information was in the chip. So if a charged particle hits a computer chip, it causes an electronic shockwave through it which disrupts the computers. They don't even have to really hit it, a moving charge, creates a magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
  • #10
newjerseyrunner said:
The universe is filled with charged particles moving at very high speed (accelerate by massive magnetic fields.) The solar wind comes off of the sun at about a million miles an hour. These are charged and you know that they are charged because when they hit the Earth's magnetic field, they are funneled to our poles causing the northern and southern lights.

Computers require very consistent environments. If you shock a computer chip, it's electrons jump all over the place and it loses whatever information was in the chip. So if a charged particle hits a computer chip, it causes an electronic shockwave through it which disrupts the computers. They don't even have to really hit it, a moving charge, creates a magnetic field.
I am asking that how the cosmic radiation affect the outer covering metal surface of the satellite? And not about the electronics parts? sorry i am not arguing with you. just to clarify my doubt i am asking this.Does the overcosmic radiation affect the soil of the celestrial body?
 
  • #11
I don't think the radiation actually has any affect on the skin of the spacecraft other than charging it. There are a few things that would happen in the very long term though.

A charged metal skin will attract atoms charged the opposite way. When metal touches metal in the vacuum of space, they instantly weld together. Very long term, a metal spacecraft would end up with a crust of welded on metallic space-dust, this is in magnitudes of millions of years though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
  • #12
newjerseyrunner said:
I don't think the radiation actually has any affect on the skin of the spacecraft other than charging it. There are a few things that would happen in the very long term though.

A charged metal skin will attract atoms charged the opposite way. When metal touches metal in the vacuum of space, they instantly weld together. Very long term, a metal spacecraft would end up with a crust of welded on metallic space-dust, this is in magnitudes of millions of years though.
Is the usage of metal on the outer surface is difficult. It means the designing of spacecraft would never include any metal surface?
 
  • #13
praveena said:
Is the usage of metal on the outer surface is difficult. It means the designing of spacecraft would never include any metal surface?

Have a read through this article and the sub-articles that it references:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft_design

That should help you out. :smile:
 
  • #14
  • #15
One of the problems with Earth orbit missions nowadays is space junk . NASA keeps track of most of the large bits but there are many untracked small bits out there as well .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena
  • #16
Nidum said:
One of the problems with Earth orbit missions nowadays is space junk . NASA keeps track of most of the large bits but there are many untracked small bits out there as well .

The Long Duration Exposure Facility provided quite a bit of info on the untracked small bits (at least the probability, frequency, and effect of strikes). It was a satellite dropped off by the space shuttle and picked up a few years later. Its sole purpose was to orbit the Earth and get struck by space debris. It had a multitude of surfaces covering its body in order to measure the effect of collisions on various types of surfaces.

It made for a very pretty satellite, due to the various surfaces covering it. An image is posted here (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/LDEF_over_payload_bay.jpg), which I don't want to post directly, since the image is a bit large.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena and Nidum
  • #17
BobG said:
The Long Duration Exposure Facility provided quite a bit of info on the untracked small bits (at least the probability, frequency, and effect of strikes). It was a satellite dropped off by the space shuttle and picked up a few years later. Its sole purpose was to orbit the Earth and get struck by space debris. It had a multitude of surfaces covering its body in order to measure the effect of collisions on various types of surfaces.

It made for a very pretty satellite, due to the various surfaces covering it. An image is posted here (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/LDEF_over_payload_bay.jpg), which I don't want to post directly, since the image is a bit large.

Can you imagine if an alien spacecraft was tooling by and saw that satellite in space? They'd be going WTH??! (or whatever aliens say when they are confused...) :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
946
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
19K