How to Avoid Breaking Physics With Your “What If” Question

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phinds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 16K views
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
19,385
Reaction score
15,621
We get a lot of “what if” questions here on Physics Forums. This article will explore three different types and then some suggestions for students who feel their questions may fall into one of those types.

“what if” questions that contradict physics as we know it
“what if” questions that are themselves self-contradictory
“what if” questions that can be answered but with some difficulty
suggestions for the student


Table of Contents
Toggle“What If” Questions That Contradict Physics as We Know It“What If” Questions That Are Themselves...


[url="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-to-avoid-breaking-physics-with-your-what-if-question/"]Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, DrClaude, cnh1995 and 12 others
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an incredibly useful post as someone new to forums, and rather unsure how and if to post something I've worked on. Thanks phinds!
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yo yo and phinds
I know old thread.
@phinds, "What if" questions are par for the course.

Physics principles are taught in isolation, with an unstated "given all other things". The student is left to extrapolate for themselves.
I have a question of my own that violates the laws, and I am not sure how to ask it now.

Isn't
“I know that the atom is not the smallest thing in existence but could physics be made to work if quarks did not exist?”
in the same category as
“What would be the effect if there were no back EMF in a DC motor?”,
I am assuming there is some evidence for the existence of quarks.

There is a need for a place to ask 'stupid' questions and get a quick answer. Stupid questions tend to arise when we are asked to believe a contradiction
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marees
mattrix said:
There is a need for a place to ask 'stupid' questions and get a quick answer. Stupid questions tend to arise when we are asked to believe a contradiction
Just make sure you frame it as a question and you should be fine. Framing as a statement/argument like "twins paradox proves special relativity is wrong" is how you get in trouble.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattrix, Nugatory and phinds