How to Build Complex Laplace Operator from First Principles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter topcomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Laplacian
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 6K views
topcomer
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Has anyone ever heard about a Complex Laplace Operator? I would like to build one from first principles as in differential geometry ∆=d*d, where d is the exterior derivative, but I don't know where to start. Actually, I was even unsure in which forum to post the question.

If one defines d to be the gradient operator acting on continuous or discrete functions, then one gets the canonical Laplace operator or the Laplace matrix used in graph theory and image processing. But what if one consider complex-valued functions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Has this been done? For complex function w(z) = f(x) + i.g(y), z = x + i.y... I don't see how to get a Laplace operator from it! Would be interested to know how it is done though, so I think I'll subscribe (and bump).
 
MikeyW said:
Has this been done? For complex function w(z) = f(x) + i.g(y), z = x + i.y... I don't see how to get a Laplace operator from it! Would be interested to know how it is done though, so I think I'll subscribe (and bump).

I have no idea, for complex functions there is a standard definition of taking the derivative w.r.t. z and its conjugate, but I don't see how to use this to construct the Hodge Laplacian I'm interested in.
 
I guess you could take the gradient of the divergence of real and imaginary parts of the function on the complex plane?