How to Build Complex Laplace Operator from First Principles

  • Thread starter Thread starter topcomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Laplacian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of constructing a Complex Laplace Operator from first principles, specifically using the framework of differential geometry. The original poster expresses uncertainty about where to begin, particularly in applying the exterior derivative to complex-valued functions. They note that while the canonical Laplace operator can be derived from the gradient operator, the application to complex functions remains unclear. Participants suggest considering the standard definitions of derivatives with respect to a complex variable and its conjugate, and exploring the gradient of the divergence of the real and imaginary parts. The conversation highlights a need for clarity on how to effectively build the desired operator in this context.
topcomer
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Has anyone ever heard about a Complex Laplace Operator? I would like to build one from first principles as in differential geometry ∆=d*d, where d is the exterior derivative, but I don't know where to start. Actually, I was even unsure in which forum to post the question.

If one defines d to be the gradient operator acting on continuous or discrete functions, then one gets the canonical Laplace operator or the Laplace matrix used in graph theory and image processing. But what if one consider complex-valued functions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Has this been done? For complex function w(z) = f(x) + i.g(y), z = x + i.y... I don't see how to get a Laplace operator from it! Would be interested to know how it is done though, so I think I'll subscribe (and bump).
 
MikeyW said:
Has this been done? For complex function w(z) = f(x) + i.g(y), z = x + i.y... I don't see how to get a Laplace operator from it! Would be interested to know how it is done though, so I think I'll subscribe (and bump).

I have no idea, for complex functions there is a standard definition of taking the derivative w.r.t. z and its conjugate, but I don't see how to use this to construct the Hodge Laplacian I'm interested in.
 
I guess you could take the gradient of the divergence of real and imaginary parts of the function on the complex plane?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top