How to Calculate Cylinder Mass Using Rotational Dynamics and Mechanical Energy?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a solid cylinder using two different approaches: rotational dynamics and conservation of mechanical energy. The problem involves a mass hanging from a string wrapped around the cylinder, with specific details about the distance fallen and time taken.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore using free-body diagrams and equations of motion to find acceleration and subsequently the mass of the cylinder. There are attempts to apply conservation of energy principles, including potential and kinetic energy considerations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on relevant equations and concepts, while others express confusion about specific variables and the application of energy conservation. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between translational and rotational kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the definitions of certain variables and the assumptions made in the energy equations. There is also a recognition of the complexity in separating the energies of the block and the cylinder.

PhysicsDud
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Ok I'm in desperate need of some direction! I have the following question in which I must answer twice once using rotational dynamics and then again using Conservation of Mechanical Energy.

Question:
A massless string is wrapped around a solid cylinder as
shown in the diagram at the right. A block of mass
kg 2.0 = m hangs from the string. When released, the
block falls a distance 82 cm in 2.0 s. Starting with a freebody
diagram, calculate the mass of the cylinder.

I have started with ma + 0.5m(cylinder)a= -mg
That got me a mass of 43.2 kg for the cylinder

determining a from the equation v^2 = v2^2 +2a (y-y2)
a = 0.1025 m/s^2

But I don't think that's right

Now for Mechanical Energy I'm completely lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using S = ut + 1/2 a t^2, you can find acceleration a.

V = u + at should give you the final velocity.

For rotational part:

Use, Torque = I Alpha.

For mechanical energy:

Use conservation of energy :

Total energy of the system = potantial energy of the weight + Rotational KE of the cylinder + KE of the hanging mass.
 
i don't understand what s and u represent?

Also, for mechanical energy I tried:
M=m1+m2 I = 0.5 m2 r^2 omega = v/r

0.5Mv1^2 + 0.5Iomega1^2 + Mgh1 =
0.5Mv2^2 + 0.5Iomega2^2 + Mgh2

E initial = m2gh = 2.0kg x 9.80 x 0 = 0

E final = m1gh + 0.5 m1v^2 + 0.5 Iomega^2 = m1gh + 0.5m1v^2 + 1/4 m2v^2

m2 = .425 ?

What have I done wrong?
 
PhysicsDud said:
i don't understand what s and u represent?
In Gamma's equation, s stands for distance and u stands for initial speed.

Also, for mechanical energy I tried:
M=m1+m2 I = 0.5 m2 r^2 omega = v/r

0.5Mv1^2 + 0.5Iomega1^2 + Mgh1 =
0.5Mv2^2 + 0.5Iomega2^2 + Mgh2
This is a bit confusing:
The cylinder (mass = m2) only rotates (I presume) so the only relevant energy for the cylinder is rotational KE (its gravitational PE doesn't change). The block (mass = m1), on the other hand, falls, so it has both translational KE and gravitational PE. So rewrite your mechanical energy equation.
 
KE = KE + PE

0.5 m(cylinder) v^2 = 0.5 m(block) v^2 + m(block) gh

v = .82m/s
a = .41 m/s^2

Is this correct?
 
No. Think this way: Initially nothing is moving so the only energy is potential. As the block falls the potential energy decreases as the kinetic energy increases. The kinetic energy has two parts: The KE of the block ([tex]1/2 m_b v^2[/tex]) plus the rotational KE of the cylinder ([tex]1/2 I_c \omega^2[/tex]).
 
Alright so let's see now, if there is only PE at first then the equation would be:

PE = KE(block) + KE(Cylinder)
mgy = [tex]1/2 m_b v^2[/tex] + [tex]1/2 I_c omega^2[/tex]

Am I getting there?
 
yes, You are getting there.
 
I am confused about the KE(cylinder) in the above equation. Can someone please explain this? Thanks.
 
  • #10
Lma12684 said:
I am confused about the KE(cylinder) in the above equation. Can someone please explain this?
Can you be more specific? What exactly do you not understand about it?

An object that rotates about its center of mass has a rotational KE equal to [itex]1/2 I \omega^2[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
11K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K