How to Calculate Forces in Bridge Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mister V
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating forces at various points (A, B, C, D, E) in a bridge with a length of 200m, considering the effects of thermal expansion. The calculated forces include Na = 11.0 kN, Ne = 3.67 kN, Fab = Fde = 7.35 kN, Fac = Fce = 6.37 kN, Fbc = Fcd = 4.24 kN, and Fbd = 8.49 kN. A key point raised is the difference in normal forces at points A and E, despite the mass being equally distributed, which is attributed to the inability to have horizontal reactions at these points under vertical loads. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding static equilibrium in bridge structures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in structures
  • Knowledge of force decomposition and vector analysis
  • Familiarity with bridge design principles and thermal expansion effects
  • Proficiency in using trigonometric functions for force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in truss structures
  • Learn about the effects of thermal expansion on structural integrity
  • Explore advanced force decomposition techniques in engineering mechanics
  • Review case studies of bridge designs that incorporate horizontal movement allowances
USEFUL FOR

Civil engineers, structural engineers, students studying mechanics of materials, and anyone involved in bridge design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Mister V
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem statement:

Bridge of length: 200m
Construction can expand horizontally to allow thermic expansion
Masses of beams: small in comparison to the car
Mass of the car: 1360 kg.

The answers: Na= 11,0 kN, Ne= 3,67 kN, Fab = Fde = 7,35 kN, Fac = Fce = 6,37 kN, Fbc=Fcd= 4,24 kN, Fbd = 8,49 kN

Question: Calculate the forces in points A,B,C,D,E

brug1.jpg



Homework Equations



We've already solved a similar bridge, but there was not the possibility of horizontal expansion.

In the similar bridge we stated that, as the beams were in static equilibrium, the forces should be parallel to the beams, either pointing outwards or inwards:

brug3.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution




My problem is I haven't got a clue how to incorporate the ability to move horizontally. Do I have to allow the forces to be non parallel to the beams?
What I find hard to understand is the fact that the normal force in point A (Na) is different form the normal force in point E (Ne)? I thought that, since the massa is equally distributed along the bridge, the normal forces would be the weight of the car divided by 2.

I have made a drawing with the forces, knowing that when I found a negative force, I assumed the wrong direction.

brug2.jpg


I thought to calculate Fab by saying that there are only forces having a vertical component, so those two should be zero when added.

I stated Fn is = 6670,80. , so Fab . sin(40°) = - 6670,80, Fab = -10377 N, which apparently is wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mister V said:
[
In the similar bridge we stated that, as the beams were in static equilibrium, the forces should be parallel to the beams, either pointing outwards or inwards:
That's correct, as long as you have a pure truss with loads applied at the joints.
My problem is I haven't got a clue how to incorporate the ability to move horizontally. Do I have to allow the forces to be non parallel to the beams?
No, this just means that there can be no horizontal reactions at A and E, under the vertically applied load.
What I find hard to understand is the fact that the normal force in point A (Na) is different form the normal force in point E (Ne)? I thought that, since the massa is equally distributed along the bridge, the normal forces would be the weight of the car divided by 2.
me too.
I have made a drawing with the forces, knowing that when I found a negative force, I assumed the wrong direction.

I thought to calculate Fab by saying that there are only forces having a vertical component, so those two should be zero when added.

I stated Fn is = 6670,80. , so Fab . sin(40°) = - 6670,80, Fab = -10377 N, which apparently is wrong ?
Looks right to me. The answer key looks wrong.
 
Thanks for helping me out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
26K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K