MHB How to Calculate Initial Speed and Impact Speed of a Vertically Thrown Stone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial speed (u) and impact speed of a stone thrown vertically from a height of 30 meters, the motion can be divided into two phases: the ascent to maximum height and the descent back to the ground. The time taken to reach maximum height can be denoted as t, with the stone traveling a distance of (gt^2)/2 during this phase. The remaining time for the descent is (5-t) seconds, where the distance fallen can be expressed as (g(5-t)^2)/2. By setting up an equation based on the total distance of 30 meters and solving for t, the initial speed u can be derived as u = gt. This method allows for the calculation of both the initial speed and the speed at impact.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a stone us thrown vertically upwards under gravity with a speed of u m/s from a point 30 metres above the horizontal ground. the stone hist the ground 5 seconds later.

(i) find the value if u
(i)find the speed with which the particle hits the ground.

can someone help me work this out. i tried to divide it into 2 different parts. from when the stone is thrown up to when it gets to v=0 and then from when it drops back down to earth. i tried to use uvast equations and i could say the 1st bit has time t and the next bit has 5-t time but the intial speeds are not the same so i don't know what to do
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can use the fact that a stone dropped from rest travels distance $\dfrac{gt^2}{2}$ and has speed $gt$ after falling for $t$ seconds (or, conversely, a stone thrown up vertically with speed $gt$ reaches the maximum height after time $t$ and travels distance $\dfrac{gt^2}{2}$). Indeed, the speed increases by $g$ each second, and $\dfrac{gt^2}{2}$ is the area under the graph of speed plotted over time, which is distance.

Suppose, as you do, that the stone took $t$ seconds to reach its maximum height. Then it flew $\dfrac{gt^2}{2}$ meters over the initial position. The distance it traveled on the way down is $\dfrac{g(5-t)^2}{2}$. This allows forming an equation in $t$. Once you know $t$, you can find $u=gt$.

Another way to solve this is to use the fact that a stone thrown vertically upward with speed $u$ from height $h_0$ is at height $h(t)=h_0+ut-\dfrac{gt^2}{2}$ after time $t$. You can equate $h(t)$ to 0 and find $u$ from there.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top