- #1

- 38

- 4

Is there a simple formula/equation for calculating the mass of a star simply by measuring it's redshift. I know there is a way to do it, but have been unable to find any clues on the web..

Thanks for your help! :)

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- #1

- 38

- 4

Is there a simple formula/equation for calculating the mass of a star simply by measuring it's redshift. I know there is a way to do it, but have been unable to find any clues on the web..

Thanks for your help! :)

- #2

- 20,004

- 10,653

If you know or can neglect the effects of the other contributions, you can use the gravitational red shift to compute the mass of the star (or rather M/R, gravitational redshift depends on this quantity).

- #3

- 38

- 4

- #4

- 20,004

- 10,653

- #5

- 38

- 4

I've been working on it, and I think this may work, M = z(rc^2)/G , where "z" is the redshift, do you think this would work, it seems to be giving around the correct result, but I would much prefer someone wiser to review and correct...

- #6

- 20,004

- 10,653

- #7

- 38

- 4

OK thank you for the help and advice :)

- #8

Gold Member

- 4,672

- 406

And note you are actually getting M/r, not M, by observing z. That wouldn't work so well for giant stars, because M/r is very small and hard to detect, and it's not that helpful for main-sequence stars, because they all tend to have a similar M/r so you'd need to detect z very precisely to distinguish them, but the z would only be about 1 part in 100,000. But it is very handy for white dwarfs, because white dwarfs have a mass-radius relationship, such that r is proportional to MI've been working on it, and I think this may work, M = z(rc^2)/G , where "z" is the redshift, do you think this would work, it seems to be giving around the correct result, but I would much prefer someone wiser to review and correct...

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 908

- Replies
- 42

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 787

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 821

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 44

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 777

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 382

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 886

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 940