How to calculate the Wigner function for an entangled state

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Wigner function for an entangled state generated by combining a vacuum state and a squeezed state through a beam splitter. Participants explore various approaches to derive the Wigner function, including tracing out states and using different representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a density operator for an entangled state created by sending a vacuum and a squeezed state through a beam splitter, expressing uncertainty about how to calculate the Wigner function from this point.
  • Another participant challenges the initial density operator, suggesting that it may not accurately represent the state obtained from the described process and provides an alternative formulation involving a rotation operator.
  • A subsequent reply questions whether the tracing out procedure for obtaining the single-mode density operator is the same for entangled states as for separable states.
  • Another participant suggests using the Fock representation to derive the characteristic function of the state, indicating that this method may simplify the calculation of the Wigner function.
  • The original poster expresses gratitude for the guidance and acknowledges a lack of knowledge regarding the limitations of calculating Wigner functions in the proposed manner.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct formulation of the density operator or the method for calculating the Wigner function, indicating multiple competing views and unresolved questions regarding the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential difficulties in working with position representation and the need for careful consideration of entangled states when tracing out modes. There is also mention of the possibility of not arriving at a closed analytical form for the Wigner function.

khfrekek92
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate a Wigner Function of an entangled state, and I'm not quite sure how to proceed. I have created this state by sending in vacuum and a squeezed state into a 50/50 BS, where the output state has a density operator:

$$\rho_{34}=S_{3}S_{4}S_{34}|00\rangle_{34}\langle 00|_{34}S_{34}^{\dagger}S_{4}^{\dagger}S_{3}^{\dagger}$$

Where $S_{3}$, $S_{4}$ and $S_{34}$ are the usual single and two mode squeezing operators.

Now I'm kind of stuck on how to calculate the Wigner function from here. I'm assuming I need to trace out one of the states as follows:

$$
\begin{aligned}
\rho_{3}&=Tr_{4}(\rho_{34})\\
&=S_{3}Tr_{4}[S_{4}S_{34}|00\rangle_{34}\langle 00|_{34}S_{34}^{\dagger}S_{4}^{\dagger}]S_{3}^{\dagger}\\
&=S_{3}Tr_{4}[S_{34}|00\rangle_{34}\langle 00|_{34}S_{34}^{\dagger}]S_{3}^{\dagger}\\
&=S_{3}Tr_{4}[|TMSV\rangle_{34}\langle TMSV|_{34}]S_{3}^{\dagger}\\
&=S_{3}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}[_{4}\langle n|TMSV\rangle_{34}._{34}\langle TMSV|n\rangle_{4}]S_{3}^{\dagger}\\
&=\frac{S_{3}}{\cosh^{2}(r)}\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}[\tanh^{2m}(r)|m\rangle_{4}\langle m|_{4}]S_{3}^{\dagger}
\end{aligned}
$$Then to calculate the Wigner function, we use:

$$W_{3}=\frac{1}{2\pi{h}}\int_{-inf}^{inf}._{3}<q-\frac{y}{2}|\frac{S_{3}}{cosh^{2}(r)}\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}tanh^{2m}(r)|m>_{3}<m|S_{3}^{\dagger}|q+\frac{y}{2}>e^{\frac{ipy}{h}}dy$$
And then I get stuck. I have no idea how I would calculate this. Did I miss anything? Does anyone have anything that could maybe point me in the right direction? Thanks so much in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure that the state \rho_{34} you wrote is obtained by passing a vacuum squeezed state through a beam spliter.
If you start with a two-mode (##a## and ##b##) vacuum state, apply the squeezing operator on mode ##a## and then send the two modes through a beam spliter should look like this:
\left|\left.0_a0_b\right&gt;\right.
Apply squeezing operator on mode ##a##, ##S_a(\eta)=\exp\left(\frac{\eta}{2}\left(a^\dagger\right)^2-\frac{\eta^\ast}{2}a^2\right)##:
S_a(\eta)\left|\left.0_a0_b\right&gt;\right.
Now apply the rotation operator on both modes, ##R(\xi)=\exp\left(\xi a^\dagger b-\xi^\ast a b^\dagger\right)##:
R(\xi)S_a(\eta)\left|\left.0_a0_b\right&gt;\right.
and the density matrix of the final two-mode state should look like
\rho=R(\xi)S_a(\eta)\left|\left.0_a0_b\right&gt;\right.\left&lt;\left.0_a0_b\right|\right.S^\dagger_a(\eta)R^\dagger(\xi)
 
Ah yes I see what you mean, I'll have to go back through and see what I missed. So now, with your $\rho$, do I just need to Trace over b to get the single-mode density operator for state a, and then plug that into the Winter integral as usual? Or do you need to do something different for entangled states?
 
It might be difficult to work with position representation, i.e. to calculate the integral over the continuous variable ##y##. I did similar calculations long time ago and we used Fock representation in order to obtain quasi-distribution functions (including Wigner function). First we derived the characteristic function of the state:

\chi(\alpha,\beta;p)=\exp\left(p\frac{|\alpha|^2+|\beta|^2}{2}\right)\mbox{Tr}\left(\rho D_a(\alpha)D_b(\beta)\right)

##D## is the displacement operator. Then the quasi-probability function is just the Fourier transform of the characteristic function. To obtain the Wigner function one sets ##p=0##.

By using Fock representation one transform the integral into (infinite) sums. Give it a try to see if you can handle the calculation, probably you won't arrive to a closed analytical form but maybe you can put it in a nice form of a (infinte) sum.
 
Alright thank you so much for pointing me in the right direction! I didn't know you couldn't calculate Wigner functions like that. I'll read up on that and give it a try. Thanks so much for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K