How to Calculate Volume of a Lake Using Different Approximation Methods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Endorser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Volume
Click For Summary
To calculate the volume of a lake using the provided depth and interval data, it's essential to incorporate the third dimension, which is the lake's width or length in the z direction. The discussion highlights methods for calculating the area under the curve, such as upper and lower rectangles, the trapezium method, and Simpson's method, but emphasizes that without z-direction data, volume cannot be accurately determined. Participants express confusion regarding how to proceed without this crucial information. The lack of z-direction data is a significant barrier to calculating the lake's volume. Understanding all three dimensions is necessary for accurate volume calculations.
Endorser
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I am given a table of values to calculate the volume of water in a lake.

X(m) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Y(m) 10.2 39.1 56.9 43.2 28.5 17.7 9.8

Where X is intervals across the lake
Where Y is depth of the lake in meters

The aim is to work out the volume using a range of different methods, including;

Upper and lower rectangles
Trapezium Method
Simpson's Method

I understand how to calculate the area under the curve, however i am not sure how to use the values calculated for area to determine the volume of the lake

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure either. Are you given any information about the z direction? You can't calculate volume if you only have information about 2 of the 3 dimensions.
 
no z direction, nothing, that is what has me confused
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
956
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K