TFT
- 18
- 0
Using the Mayer–Vietoris sequence, how can we calculate the
De Rham cohomology of the Kelin bottle?
De Rham cohomology of the Kelin bottle?
The discussion revolves around computing the De Rham cohomology of the Klein bottle using the Mayer–Vietoris sequence. Participants explore the appropriate open cover for the Klein bottle and its implications for cohomological results, comparing it to the torus and other surfaces.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the open cover and the resulting cohomological conclusions. There is no consensus on the correctness of the initial claims regarding the cohomology of the Klein bottle and its comparison to the torus.
Participants reference the need to compute the cohomology of the torus and the implications of their findings, but there are unresolved questions about the accuracy of these computations and the definitions used in the discussion.
morphism said:First step would be to find a good open cover. Have you done so yet?
zhentil said:I don't think those are cylinders ;)
Once you figure out what they are (and compute their cohomology, which is pretty straightforward), you'll have the answer.
zhentil said:Why do they have the same cohomology as the cylinder? That's certainly not true.
morphism said:That's the open cover I had in mind. Those two mobius strips and their intersection (another mobius strip) have the cohomology of the circle. In fact, it turns out that the Klein bottle does as well.
So either you haven't computed the cohomology of the torus correctly, or you're messing up the MV argument.