Morse-witten cohomology for non-orientable target spaces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter electroweak
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Morse theory to non-orientable spaces, specifically focusing on the Klein bottle and the projective plane. Participants explore the existence and characteristics of Morse functions in these contexts, examining both theoretical implications and specific examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether Morse homology is defined for non-orientable spaces and whether it can be extended to such cases.
  • Another participant references a theorem stating that any compact manifold possesses a Morse function, discussing the proof involving embeddings and Sard's Theorem.
  • A participant proposes using the height function from an immersion of the Klein bottle in R3 as a potential Morse function, expressing uncertainty about its validity.
  • One participant suggests that the arguments for embeddings may apply to immersions, noting that the distance function to most points should yield a Morse function, while expressing doubt about the height function.
  • A participant describes a construction using a rectangle to form a flat Klein bottle and proposes that the distance function to the center of the rectangle could be a Morse function, despite the presence of critical points.
  • Another participant clarifies that the distance function for an immersion must adhere to the surface without switching at intersections.
  • A participant presents a potential Morse function for the projective plane based on distances to the north pole, noting its critical points and relating it to the Euler characteristic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of Morse functions for non-orientable spaces, particularly the Klein bottle and projective plane. There is no consensus on the validity of proposed functions or the applicability of existing theorems.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the properties of Morse functions and the implications of embeddings versus immersions, which remain unresolved. The specific conditions under which certain functions are considered Morse are not fully clarified.

electroweak
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I'm reading "Mirror Symmetry" by Hori et al. In it, they compute the cohomology groups for the sphere and the torus. I tried to do the same for the Klein bottle, and it isn't working out.

Is Morse homology defined for non-orientable spaces? If not, why not? Can it be extended?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a theorem that any compact manifold possesses a Morse function. The proof in Milnor's Morse Theory relies on the ability to embed any smooth manifold in Euclidean space and then proving - using Sard's Theorem - that the distance function from the points in the manifold to some fixed point in Euclidean space has no degenerate critical points.

Before I thought I had an explicit example of Morse function for the Klein bottle but on further thought the function seemed to have an entire circle of critical points. I would like to see a Morse function for the Klein bottle and also for the projective plane.
 
Last edited:
Consider the height function on the image of some nice immersion of the Klein Bottle in R3. Pullback the height function by the immersion to obtain a potential on the actual Klein Bottle.

Is this a Morse function? If so, I can't get it to work. If not, why isn't it?
 
I think the same arguments that work for embeddings also work for immersions. For an immersed Klein bottle in 3 space the distance function to most points - except for a set of measure zero - will be a Morse function. I am not sure about the height function.

Here is another thought.

Take a rectangle - not a square - in the plane and make a flat Klein bottle by pasting the opposite sides to each other. It seems that the function that measures the Euclidean distance to the center of the rectangle is a Morse function. This also works on a flat torus. I was confused since there is one maximum and minimum and two saddle point in each but I guess the cell attaching maps are different.
 
I should have said but I think you already knew this that the distance function for an immersion has to follow the surface and not switch at intersections.
 
Here is a thought for the projective plane. Each point in the plane has two inverse images in the 2 sphere each either lying on the equator or one in the northern and the other its antipode in the southern hemisphere. The function will be the distance of the point in the northern hemisphere to the north pole. For points along the equator, it is also the distance to the north pole. This seems to be a Morse function with one critical point - which is correct since its Euler characteristic is 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
27K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
23K