I How to correct (adjust) Amazon ratings based on the number of reviews

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wes Turner
  • Start date Start date
Wes Turner
Messages
68
Reaction score
15
I would like a way to compare Amazon ratings as a function of the number of reviews. I think it's pretty clear that a product with a 4.9 rating based of 5,000 reviews is likely better than one with a 5.0 rating based on just 1 review. But how can I calculate an adjusted rating for a set of products
such as the ones in this table of ratings and number of reviews.

1716078636487.png


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you could set a threshold and use a Bayesian approach to assess the posterior probability that the rating is higher than the threshold
 
I don't know what that is or how to do it. Is there a formula I can put in the Adjusted Rating column?

I was thinking about calculating a confidence interval. Here's my first try at that. I calculated the confidence interval using the Excel T-distribution confidence interval function, then subtracted that from the rating.

I then did the same thing using the Excel N-distribution confidence interval function and subtracted that from the rating.

Here's the data for a 95% confidence interval. The last column shows the difference in the rankings from using an N-distribution function vs a T-distribution function.

1716085458200.png


Any comments? Is there a better way? Should I use a different confidence interval (97%? 99%?)?

Thanks
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top