- #31
Florian Geyer
- 95
- 29
That's right, I have done that to add some privacy and freedom to my activities in this forum.Vanadium 50 said:
Methods for assessing textbook quality -- Expert opinions needed
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around methods for assessing the quality of physics textbooks, particularly in the context of a new textbook on quantum mechanics by J. D. Jackson. Participants explore various criteria for evaluating textbooks, including their pedagogical approaches, the importance of problem sets, and the relevance of the authors' backgrounds.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that there is no universally best textbook, but rather a best textbook for individual needs and learning styles.
- Concerns are raised about the level of the Jackson textbook, which is based on graduate course notes, potentially making it unsuitable for freshman-level students.
- Participants emphasize the importance of a textbook's track record and the potential risks of choosing newly published works without established reviews.
- There is a discussion about the necessity of textbooks that bridge gaps in foundational knowledge and problem-solving skills within the physics curriculum.
- Some participants express skepticism about the new textbook's quality, noting that it may lack foundational elements and could be more analytic in nature.
- Criteria for selecting textbooks include the presence of problem sets, the availability of solution manuals, and the existence of supplementary resources like online lectures.
- There is a mention of the importance of avoiding outdated pedagogical methods in textbook selection.
- Participants share personal preferences for specific textbooks and express varying opinions on the quality of certain texts, such as Elmore and Heald's work.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the best methods for assessing textbook quality. Multiple competing views exist regarding the suitability of the Jackson textbook and the criteria for selecting effective learning materials.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the lack of consensus on what constitutes a "good" textbook, the varying levels of expertise among participants, and the dependence on personal learning styles and curricular needs.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be useful for students and educators in physics and related fields who are seeking guidance on selecting appropriate textbooks for self-study or coursework.