- 4,789
- 3,852
Paul Biensiasz is a virologist at Rockefeller Medical, he authored this on twitter, titled "musings of a
pissed virologist"
pissed virologist"
The discussion revolves around the concept of creating a virus that could evade vaccines, touching on ethical implications, the potential for misuse of scientific research, and the role of satire in scientific discourse. It includes perspectives on virology, public health policy, and the implications of synthetic biology.
Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views regarding the interpretation of the paper and the implications of creating viruses. Concerns about ethical considerations and the potential for misuse are highlighted, but no agreement is found on the necessity or desirability of such research.
The discussion includes assumptions about the motivations behind scientific research and the implications of synthetic biology, but these assumptions are not universally accepted among participants.
This discussion may be of interest to those involved in virology, public health policy, ethics in science, and the implications of synthetic biology.
jedishrfu said:One can only hope that some bad actor skilled in the art doesn’t take this paper as a high level blueprint for a designer virus such as happened with research into marijuana that devolved into K2 and other designer drugs.
Flatland said:A virus made from nanotechnology.