Undergrad How to derive momentum operator in position basis via its definition?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the momentum operator in the position basis using the definition of Hermitian operators. It emphasizes that the representation of an operator, such as the momentum operator \(\hat{p} = -i\hbar\partial_x\), requires understanding the physical properties of the operator and its behavior in the chosen basis. Key insights include the necessity of introducing a momentum basis and the importance of the inner product \(\langle x|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle\) for deriving specific operators. The references to Ballentine's chapters provide foundational knowledge for this derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with position and momentum bases
  • Knowledge of inner product notation in quantum mechanics
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Ballentine's "Quantum Mechanics" Chapters 3 and 4 for operator representations
  • Learn about the properties of Dirac delta functions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between position and momentum representations in Hilbert space
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists, and researchers interested in operator theory and the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics.

LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
Let the representation of a Hermitian Operator in some basis ##x## be
$$\hat A\equiv A(x)$$
and let
$$\psi(x)=\langle x\vert\psi\rangle$$

Then we define

$$A(x)\,\psi(x)=\langle x\vert\hat A\vert\psi\rangle$$

This is the Wikipedia article that mentions this.

From here how do we derive the momentum operator (or any other) on a position basis?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
LightPhoton said:
From here how do we derive the momentum operator (or any other) on a position basis?
You don't. The information given is not enough to specify any particular operator. All it is telling you is general properties that any operator will satisfy in the position basis.
 
  • Like
Likes LightPhoton
LightPhoton said:
how do we derive the momentum operator
Generally representations for specific operators are derived by looking at the physical properties that the operators are expected to satisfy as observables. See, for example, Chapters 3 (particularly section 3.4) and 4 (particularly section 4.1) of Ballentine.
 
  • Like
Likes LightPhoton
LightPhoton said:
Let the representation of a Hermitian Operator in some basis $x$ be
$$\hat A\equiv A(x)$$
and let
$$\psi(x)=\langle x\vert\psi\rangle$$

Then we define

$$A(x)\,\psi(x)=\langle x\vert\hat A\vert\psi\rangle$$
You are missing a key ingredients here, you are missing the
$$\langle x|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\int\mathrm dx' \langle x|\hat{A}|x'\rangle\langle x'|\psi\rangle=\int\mathrm dx' \langle x|\hat{A}|x'\rangle\psi(x')$$
If ##\hat{A}## has a nice way to represent it in position space then you can write ##\hat{A}|x\rangle=A(x)|x\rangle## so you get
$$\langle x|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\int\mathrm dx' \langle x|x'\rangle A(x')\psi(x')=\int \mathrm d x' \delta(x-x')A(x')\psi(x')=A(x)\psi(x)$$

Edit: this is important if you want to derive the momentum operator. The crucial step consist in introducing a momentum base between ##\hat{A}## and ##|\psi\rangle## but then you would also need to know what is ##\langle p|x\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes wnvl2 and LightPhoton
pines-demon said:
You are missing a key ingredients here, you are missing the
$$\langle x|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\int\mathrm dx' \langle x|\hat{A}|x'\rangle\langle x'|\psi\rangle=\int\mathrm dx' \langle x|\hat{A}|x'\rangle\psi(x')$$
If ##\hat{A}## has a nice way to represent it in position space then you can write ##\hat{A}|x\rangle=A(x)|x\rangle## so you get
$$\langle x|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\int\mathrm dx' \langle x|x'\rangle A(x')\psi(x')=\int \mathrm d x' \delta(x-x')A(x')\psi(x')=A(x)\psi(x)$$

Edit: this is important if you want to derive the momentum operator. The crucial step consist in introducing a momentum base between ##\hat{A}## and ##|\psi\rangle## but then you would also need to know what is ##\langle p|x\rangle##.
Thanks, really appreciate the derivation!
 
pines-demon said:
##\hat{A}|x\rangle=A(x)|x\rangle##
Actually, now that I think about it, what does this equation even mean? We are acting an operator in position representation (let's say ##\hat p=-i\hbar\partial_x##) on a ket which is in Hilbert space.
 
LightPhoton said:
Actually, now that I think about it, what does this equation even mean? We are acting an operator in position representation (let's say ##\hat p=-i\hbar\partial_x##) on a ket which is in Hilbert space.
Ah you see that's why I am saying that it makes sense only if the operator behaves well with the basis. It is not so clear what ##\hat{P}|x\rangle## does or if it even makes sense but in momentum basis it does the following ##\hat{P}|p\rangle=p|p\rangle##
 
  • Like
Likes LightPhoton

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K