How to derive this (Lagrangian of mattress) from Zee's book

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clara Chung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Derive
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a mattress model as presented in Zee's book. Key terms identified include dy, phi^2, and phi^4, which arise from considering nearest neighbor interactions and the expansion of the potential V. The potential is expressed as a power series that includes higher-order terms, with the phi^3 term potentially omitted due to symmetry assumptions. The continuum limit introduces additional terms, including the phi^4 term and derivatives of phi.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with power series expansions in physics
  • Knowledge of field theory concepts, particularly in the context of scalar fields
  • Basic grasp of continuum limits in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrangians in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in potential energy functions
  • Explore the continuum limit in the context of statistical mechanics
  • Investigate higher-order terms in perturbation theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and statistical mechanics.

Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
attached
Relevant Equations
attached
245529

I am not sure where does the dy term, phi^2 and phi^4 terms come from.
I guess there are dx and dy because we have to account for the nearest neighbour pairs in the x and y axis?
I guess there is a phi^2 term because 2q_a*q_b=(q_a-q_b)^2-q_a^2-q_b^2, the term q_a^2-q_b^2?
How about the phi^4 term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
I guess there is a phi^2 term because 2q_a*q_b=(q_a-q_b)^2-q_a^2-q_b^2, the term q_a^2-q_b^2?
That is correct.
Clara Chung said:
How about the phi^4 term?

In his expression for ##V##, he is only writing the first term in a power series, and the power series will really include all higher powers too. Although he is presumably assuming that the potential is symmetric under taking all the ##q_a## to ##-q_a##, otherwise there would be a ##\phi^3## term too. (Actually, looking at my copy of Zee, it seems that the very next equation in the book does include ##\phi^3## so this might just be a typo.) So the next term will look like

$$
V = \sum_{ab} \frac{1}{2} k_{ab} q_a q_b + \sum_{abcd} k_{abcd} q_a q_b q_c q_d + \cdots
$$
Now when you take the continuum limit of this, you'll get a bunch of terms including a ##\phi^4## term (and also terms like ##(\partial_x \phi)^2 \phi^2## which are presumably included in the ellipses along with higher order terms). If I had included a cubic term it would also allow terms like ##\phi^3##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung

Similar threads

  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
724
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K