How to determine the mass of a planet using redshift?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter avito009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Planet Redshift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to determine the mass of a planet using redshift and related concepts. Participants explore theoretical and observational aspects, including the relationship between redshift, orbital mechanics, and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the mass of a planet can be inferred from the redshift or blueshift of the star it orbits, combined with measurements of the star's orbital period.
  • Others argue that estimating the mass of the star is essential, which can be done through its spectrum, as more massive stars exhibit different colors due to their temperature.
  • A participant explains the method of using binary star systems to calibrate the relationship between color and mass, suggesting that knowledge of one star's mass allows for the estimation of another's mass.
  • Another participant mentions the wobble method, where the star's motion due to the gravitational influence of the planet can provide insights into the planet's mass without directly observing it.
  • Some participants discuss the application of Newton's second law (F=ma) to estimate the mass of the planet based on observed gravitational forces and acceleration from the wobble.
  • One participant introduces a formula relating redshift to mass, highlighting the complexities of different types of redshifts that may affect the measurements, including gravitational and cosmological redshifts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the methods to determine a planet's mass, with no consensus reached on a single approach. The discussion includes competing models and interpretations of how redshift and other factors contribute to mass estimation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on several assumptions, such as the accuracy of measurements and the definitions of redshift types. The discussion also highlights the complexity of gravitational influences and orbital dynamics that may affect calculations.

avito009
Messages
184
Reaction score
4
The size of the shift (Redshift or Blue shift) combined with measurement of the period of orbit tells us how massive an object is. How? How can we know the mass of a planet using redshift or blue shift?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It depends on first of all being able to estimate the mass of the STAR that the planet is orbiting
The mass of a normal star can be estimated by it spectrum (its colors of light). More massive stars burn HOTTER and bluer (shorter wavelengths).

Logically you might first ask how people discovered and calibrated this relation between color and mass. they used binary pairs of stars, that orbit their common center of mass. if you know the mass of one star (say it is the same color as the sun, which we know the mass of) and you can watch them go around each other, then you can tell the mass of the other. then you measure the color of the other and that gives another data point. Information about how color and mass are related builds up.

Once you know the mass of the star you can figure out the mass of the planet by how much it causes the star to wobble too and fro. the more massive star takes a more massive planet to make it wobble a certain amount.
=========================

The wobble method is just one of several methods to detect planets. Let's focus on that. In that case you don't even have to SEE the planet. You just see the star approaching, say at 10 meters per second (max), and after a while you see it slow down and start receding, at 10 meters per second (max). And then approach, and then recede, and so on. Let's assume for simplicity that we are looking at the orbit plane edge on, so we see all the to and fro speed.

Maybe someone else will take over and explain this in more detail, with Kepler's law etc. It's after midnight here and I'm too sleepy to continue.

anyway, good question! The PERIOD of the wobble gives away the distance between the two bodies (Kepler). If you know the distance, you can relate the speeds to the masses. Gotta sleep.
 
Last edited:
What if we use the formula F=ma or m=F/a to figure out the mass of this planet? If we observe the wobble can we estimate the gravitational force F? Also if me observe the orbit speed we could get to know the acceleration?
 
avito009 said:
What if we use the formula F=ma or m=F/a to figure out the mass of this planet? If we observe the wobble can we estimate the gravitational force F? Also if me observe the orbit speed we could get to know the acceleration?
Calculating the force is an unnecessary detour if you are interested in the mass, but it is possible.
 
If you are just using redshift then you could rearrange the following equation relative to m-

[tex]1+z=\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1/2}[/tex]

where [itex]M=Gm/c^2[/itex] and z is the fractional shift in a spectral wavelength [itex]z=(\lambda_o-\lambda_e)/\lambda_e)[/itex] ([itex]\lambda_o[/itex] is wavelength observed and [itex]\lambda_e[/itex] is wavelength emitted).

There will be other redshifts to contend with, redshift related to velocity as the planet orbits the star (the planet moving away and towards you), the additional gravitational redshift of the star (the stars own gravity well that the planet sits in) and any cosmological redshift that might apply to the system based on how far away it was from us.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K