How to find maximum change in the following scenario?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PatternSeeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Maximum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the physical angle α at which the change between the estimated angle β and the physical angle α is maximized, given that observers underestimate the y-dimension by 20% and accurately estimate the x-dimension. The relationship between these angles is defined by the formula β = arctan((sin α (0 + 100))/(cos α (-20 + 100)). Differential calculus is identified as the appropriate method for solving this problem, specifically by finding the derivative of the difference between angles β and α to locate stationary points within the interval [0, 90 degrees].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential calculus principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of angle measurement in degrees
  • Ability to differentiate functions and find stationary points
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the fundamentals of differential calculus, focusing on finding maxima and minima
  • Study trigonometric identities and their applications in calculus
  • Practice solving problems involving arctangent functions and angle relationships
  • Explore examples of optimization problems in calculus to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those interested in calculus and optimization techniques, as well as anyone dealing with geometric estimations and angle calculations.

PatternSeeker
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I need directions regarding methods that I could use for the following type of problem:

I am given the following scenario:

Observers consistently estimate objects as 20% shorter than they really are in the "y" dimension. They accurately estimate objects in the "x" dimension.

** error in estimated lengths in the y dimension, % error y = -20 % of physical lengths.
** error in estimated lengths in the x-dimension, % error x = 0% of physical length

Observers also consistently overestimate physical angles between "x" dimension and directions between "x" and "y" dimension.

Let physical angle = σ
Let estimated angle = β

** angle β = arctan ((sin α (% error x + 100))/(cos α ( % error y + 100))

*** Angles α and β vary between 0 deg to 90 degrees. The change between the
two is not constant, however. It will be greatest at a particular value of angle α.


QUESTION: If the physical length y is underestimated by 20 %, at which physical angle α
(between 0 and 90 degrees) will the change between angle β and angle α be
the greatest?

How would you suggest I approach this problem? Should I use differential calculus?

By the way, my background in math is pretty basic - I took undergraduate calculus a few years ago.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PatternSeeker said:
I need directions regarding methods that I could use for the following type of problem:

I am given the following scenario:

Observers consistently estimate objects as 20% shorter than they really are in the "y" dimension. They accurately estimate objects in the "x" dimension.

** error in estimated lengths in the y dimension, % error y = -20 % of physical lengths.
** error in estimated lengths in the x-dimension, % error x = 0% of physical length

Observers also consistently overestimate physical angles between "x" dimension and directions between "x" and "y" dimension.

Let physical angle = σ
Let estimated angle = β

** angle β = arctan ((sin α (% error x + 100))/(cos α ( % error y + 100))

*** Angles α and β vary between 0 deg to 90 degrees. The change between the
two is not constant, however. It will be greatest at a particular value of angle α.QUESTION: If the physical length y is underestimated by 20 %, at which physical angle α
(between 0 and 90 degrees) will the change between angle β and angle α be
the greatest?

How would you suggest I approach this problem? Should I use differential calculus?

By the way, my background in math is pretty basic - I took undergraduate calculus a few years ago.
Yes, differential calculus is the right approach to take. If it has been a while since you used it, you may need a reminder that the maximum or minimum of a differentiable function is at an end point of the function domain (in this case ##\alpha \in [0, 90\deg]##) or at a point where its derivative is zero (stationary point). So you will need to write an expression for the difference between ##\beta## and ##\alpha## and differentiate it to find a stationary point, and then check to see if it is a maximum or a minimum (or neither).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K