Chemistry How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem from the MIT OCW regarding the pH of a galvanic cell involving hydrogen and silver electrodes. The hydrogen electrode acts as the anode with a standard potential of zero, while the silver electrode has a potential of 0.22V. The calculated cell potential under specified conditions is 0.30V, leading to the determination of the reaction quotient Q and the concentration of hydrogen ions. Using the Nernst equation, a pH of 1.35 is derived, although the official MIT solution states the pH is 1. The conversation highlights the importance of significant figures in electrochemical calculations.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Using the table below determine the unknown quantity for the following galvanic cell
Relevant Equations
$$\mathrm{Pt(s)|H_2(g,1.0bar)|H^+(pH=?)||Cl^-(aq,1.0M)|AgCl(s)|Ag(s)},E=+0.30\text{V}$$
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW.

Here is what I did to try to solve it

The table cited in the problem is below

1737304254759.png

We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given.

The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22.

Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode.

Electrons flow from the hydrogen electrode to the silver electrode.

Thus, we have ##E^\circ_{\text{cell}}=0.22\text{V}##.

Note that this is the potential of the electrochemical cell under standard conditions (the half-cell potentials in the table are under these standard conditions).

We are given, however, that under the conditions specified in the problem the cell potential is 0.30V.

The conditions specified are concentrations of the ions in solution and partial pressure of hydrogen gas.

We can see how these are relevant when we write out the balanced redox equation for the cell.

We sum the oxidation half-reaction with the reduction half-reaction (which I multiplied by two to get the electrons to cancel)

$$\mathrm{H_2(g)\rightarrow 2H^+(aq)+2e^-}\tag{1}$$

$$\mathrm{2AgCl(s)+2e^-\rightarrow 2Ag(s)+2Cl^-(aq)}\tag{2}$$

and get

$$\mathrm{H_2(g)+2AgCl(s)\rightarrow 2Ag(s)+2Cl^-(aq)+2H^+(aq)}\tag{3}$$

with reaction quotient

$$Q=\mathrm{\frac{[H^+]^2[Cl^-]^2}{P_{H_2}}}=\frac{[H^+]^2[1]^2}{1}\tag{4}$$

$$\implies [H^+]=\sqrt{Q}\tag{5}$$

Using the Nernst equation, we can write

$$E_{\text{cell}}=E^\circ_{\text{cell}}-\frac{RT}{n_rF}\ln{Q}\tag{6}$$

As far as I can tell at this particular point in time, temperature is not a variable in this problem, but neither is it specified.

If we assume the temperature is 298.15K then the equation above becomes

$$E_{\text{cell}}=E^\circ_{\text{cell}}-\frac{0.025693}{n_r}\ln{Q}\tag{7}$$

and so

$$0.30\text{V}=0.22\text{V}-\frac{0.025693}{2}\ln{Q}\tag{8}$$

$$\implies Q=0.001974\tag{9}$$

Thus, using (5) we find

$$\mathrm{[H^+]=0.0445}$$

and thus since

$$pH=-\log{[H^3O^+]}$$

if we can say that ##[H^+]=[H_3O^+]## then

$$pH=1.35$$

The MIT OCW solution to the problem says pH is 1, however.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks right to me.

It may be easier with this kind of problem to use the equation in the form
E = E° - (2.303 RT/nF) log Q
and memorise 2.303 RT/F = 0.059 V (at 298 K)
That makes it simpler working with pH's for example.

(Edit: corrected equation by including n)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes zenterix and jim mcnamara
pH = 1 also entails pH = 1.35 if we only have one significant figure. Although, I can assure you most electrochemists would want a reliable digit after the decimal!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top