How to get started in HEP as an undergrad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alistarco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research Undergrad
AI Thread Summary
A physics undergrad expressed interest in high-energy physics (HEP) but was unsure how to begin. Recommendations included starting with Richard Feynman's "QED" for foundational intuition, followed by review articles from the Particle Data Group and related Wikipedia entries to understand the Standard Model. Reading blogs like Matt Strassler's and regularly checking arXiv for new publications were suggested as intermediate steps. It was also advised to consult professors for guidance and to ensure a solid grasp of prerequisites like quantum mechanics and electromagnetism before diving deeper. Engaging with these resources will help clarify the path forward in HEP studies.
Alistarco
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Greetings, im a physics undergrad (7th semester, attending modern physics), i have interest in hep but i dont know how to get started in that topic, i would like to start reading papers on the field but i dont know where to begin. Can any one give me any recommendation ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first baby step that I'd recommend would be to read "QED" by Richard Feynman. It is short, cogent, and builds good intuition for more advanced treatments. It is also more factually accurate and less speculative than many other popular physics books. Unlike many books that focus on what isn't known, he focuses on what we know already. You could finish it in a weekend (it is basically a transcription, edited, of a four lecture series he presented to educated lay people).

The next intermediate step I'd recommend would be to read to review articles available online from the Particle Data Group and the Wikipedia article related to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, the List of Mesons, the List of Baryons, and all of the articles linked in those articles, which will give you a broader framework of the discipline and its history. Learn the nomenclature for hadrons (which one of the PDG review articles explains). Reading Matt Strassler's blog and website, which also has some progressively more advanced review posts on these issues, would also be a good second step.

After that, I would recommend regularly reading new HEP publications at arXiv in the four categories under that heading (Experiment is the best to start with if you have limited time, and are reading just one), and following the websites of the major particle collider collaborations (like ATLAS, GlueX, and BESIII), and major physics conferences (like Moriond).

The next step woulds be to buy the most relevant textbook you can find at your local college bookstore for self-study and to work through it.

With that under your belt, you'll have a better idea about what you should do next.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Alistarco and BvU
Hi, thanks a lot for your advice, i will definite follow what you say, i thought i would die ignored. im very grateful for your answer
 
Alistarco said:
Greetings, im a physics undergrad (7th semester, attending modern physics), i have interest in hep but i dont know how to get started in that topic, i would like to start reading papers on the field but i dont know where to begin. Can any one give me any recommendation ?
Your thread must have gone under the radar. Are you planning to do HEP at graduate level? The obvious question is: if you haven't started the subject formally, how do you know that's what you want to study?

What do your professors say? Have you asked them?

One standard textbook is by Griffiths:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Elementary_Particles_(book)

I would say the main prerequisites are a good understanding of QM, classical EM and the four-vector formulation of SR. It's definitely advanced undergraduate level - and most other textbooks are graduate level.

I'm not sure I understand the point of trying to jump ahead in one particular area. There's a risk that you distract yourself from your course work.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top