How to increase phone signal strength by lying about it

  • Thread starter Thread starter Borg
  • Start date Start date
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,280
Reaction score
4,954
Did you ever wonder about why your phone didn't seem to have as good a signal as it indicated? This could be the reason.
Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about signal strength
Poking around in Android the other day I found this nugget in Carrier Config manager; a flag (KEY_INFLATE_SIGNAL_STRENGTH_BOOL) to always report the signal strength to the user as one bar higher than it really is.

image-2-1024x233.webp

It’s not documented in the Android docs, but it’s there in the source available for any operator to use.

Notably both AT&T and Verizon have this flag enabled on their networks...
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes jack action and Greg Bernhardt
Technology news on Phys.org
I don't quite get it. Reporting it as one bar higher doesn't actually increase the strength does it?
 
sbrothy said:
I don't quite get it. Reporting it as one bar higher doesn't actually increase the strength does it?
Hence the lying part. The method causes the phone to show one bar higher than it actually is.
 
And this is the part I don't get. What do you get out of it? Apart from it looking like your connection is better than it is?
 
sbrothy said:
And this is the part I don't get. What do you get out of it? Apart from it looking like your connection is better than it is?
"Mate, your signal strength is always better than mine. What network are you with?"
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis and PeroK
sbrothy said:
And this is the part I don't get. What do you get out of it? Apart from it looking like your connection is better than it is?
From the article, there is a lot of competition between the carriers to 'prove' that their network is better than the competitions' network. If you can get one bar even when you don't have a tower available, you can say that you have nationwide coverage with at least one bar everywhere.
 
Hey you can either round down and be a negative nellie or you can round up and be a positive pauline.

There was a story told many decades ago about a programmer implementing a new feature for executives on a timesharing service. Being a wise and emotionally intelligent programmer he inserted a sizable delay in returning answers.

As he monitored usage, he would reduce the delay as more people accessed the system until one day after usage had peaked and he saw things were working well and he could relax knowing he had gotten ahead of the expectation curve — people complaining because the service was getting slower.

His boss was really impressed by the programmers work since the programmers progress reflected favorably on him. However, he being the boss that he is, thought to push the programmer to even greater heights and asked for further improvement.

The programmer somewhat miffed that his boss was still on his case relented but carefully took his time removing the remaining delay carefully not to remove it completely but shave a few seconds to manage his boss’s expectations.

The boss was elated and gave him a big raise — would never happen now — more likely the boss would lay the programmer off, hire some newbie to take over the project and get promoted himself into the executive ranks before the sh*t hit the fan.

The End
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DaveC426913, jack action and PeroK
In the defense of the carriers, if only one is setting up the flag, it is easier to follow than trying to explain to your clients that the others are not being truthful.

It's equivalent to a vanity sizing (with a size 0!) in women's wear.

wsizes-web-history-150-new.webp
 

Similar threads