MHB How to Map a Range to -1 to 1 in Relationships?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SLSCoder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationships
SLSCoder
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a number, the high, that could be positive, negative or zero and can be a fraction.
I have another number, the low, that could also be positive, negative or zero and can be a fraction.
I have another number, the variable that is between the high and the low.

It is safe to say that the high is greater than the low.
I need to represent the high as 1 and the low as -1.
Then I need to determine what the variable value would be (between 1 and -1).

How can I solve this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$\text{So you are mapping the interval $[low,~high]$ to the interval $[-1,1]$}\\
\text{Let $x$ be your variable that you want to transform, and $\tilde{x}$ be it's new value}\\
\text{It's assumed that $low \leq x \leq high$}\\~\\
\tilde{x} = -1 + 2\dfrac{x-low}{high - low},~ -1 \leq \tilde{x} \leq 1$$
 
Thank you!
I need to write this function in code (software).
My math is pretty bad so I just want to clarify that the equation looks like this?

This is correct: low ≤ x ≤ high

-1 + 2 * ((X - lo) / (hi - lo));

I sure appreciate your help.
 
looks good if your variables are now called hi and lo
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top