How To measure Moon Orbital Velocity ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to measure the Moon's orbital velocity for a school project. Participants explore various approaches, including experimental setups and theoretical calculations, while addressing potential errors and assumptions in measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests measuring the Moon's period and radius to calculate velocity but acknowledges significant approximations that could affect accuracy.
  • Another participant hints at a more effective method without providing direct answers, emphasizing the importance of a specific term in the thread title.
  • There is a proposal to use historical data from eclipses to determine the Moon's distance and to assume a circular orbit for calculations.
  • A participant discusses the gravitational attraction between the Earth and the Moon, considering the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal acceleration.
  • One suggestion includes using a lunar laser ranging experiment as a potential method for measurement.
  • Another participant proposes calculating the circumference of the Moon's orbit to find the distance for the velocity equation, while encouraging independent research on the Moon's orbital period.
  • A later reply questions the assumption that the original poster intended to compute the Moon's orbital velocity rather than measure it empirically.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the best methods to measure the Moon's orbital velocity, with no consensus reached on a single approach. Some suggest theoretical calculations while others propose empirical measurements, indicating a lack of agreement on the most effective method.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their proposed methods, including assumptions about the Moon's orbit being circular and the potential for significant measurement errors. There is also a mention of unresolved mathematical relationships in the context of gravitational force and centripetal acceleration.

ZakieChan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Im doing a school project where we need to come up with an accurate way to measure the moons orbital velocity with an experiment...

My plan was to find the radius of the moons orbit, then its period, and based on a distance over time find its velocity. However i realize I am making a serious approximations and takes away from the quality of my measurement.

Do you know of a better way i can do such a calculation with less error? Also i have 10 weeks to have said task completed.

All help is appreciated

thanks,

Zak
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ZakieChan said:
Do you know of a better way i can do such a calculation with less error? Also i have 10 weeks to have said task completed.

Why yes, yes I do. But if I were to tell you, wouldn't your grade be based on my work and not yours?

You are correct that velocity is distance/time. You can easily measure the moon's period, but how are you going to get the distance? So clearly that's not so helpful. You'll need some other relationship. Let me point out that there is a hint in the title of your thread. One word is more important than the others.
 
lol yes your right but i was looking for more of a push in the right direction. I could find the distance by using data from past eclipses like Hipparchus did.. then can i say its orbit is a circle and use geometry to get its distance traveled over time? My big question is how could i approach this to get a lower percent deviation? Can i say the moon orbits in a perfect circle and not have a significant impact on my data? In reality my teacher couldn't be bothered as is only a small part of a total project/presentation but it would be nice to have a close estimate instead of being off 1000 m/s.

is my plan of attack going to have good results ?

thanks for imput

zak
 
You're working too hard.

Why is the moon in orbit? Tackle it from that direction.
 
ok its because its in the Earth's gravitational field. The Earth and the moon are attracting each other, the net effect is that the moon is pulled toward earth. Always falling... the reason it doesn't hit is because the moon is constantly moving at a given orbit velocity. this makes the moon always "miss" the earth...

so do i look at it like the force of attraction= Gm1m2/r*r = centripetal acc ??

am i looking at it right? my group also found a way were you have a graduated eye piece in a telescope... and measure the relative diameter of the moon over its period seeing its diameter oscillate and based on focal length of lens in telescope determine distance from optics equations...

are we getting warmer ?? lol

thanks for imput
 
Lunar laser ranging experiment might be helpful.
 
ZakieChan said:
so do i look at it like the force of attraction= Gm1m2/r*r = centripetal acc ??

Well, that's not a correct equation, since you have a force on one side and an acceleration on the other. I'll also point out that it'll work better if you use g instead of G.
 
This is probably way to late but why don't you think about finding the circumference of the the circle and using that as the distance variable in the veloctiy= distance/time. since i know that Vanadium wants you to learn by yourself, I am going to let you research how long it takes for the moon to go around the earth. :)
 
This is obviously necroposting, but I'm curious: all the users responding to the question assumed the OP was trying to compute the Moon's orbital velocity. It seemed to me that the OP wanted to measure it empirically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K