How to measure which slit a photon went through

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter michelcolman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Photon Slit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the double slit experiment, specifically how to determine which slit a photon passes through without disrupting the interference pattern. It highlights that attempting to measure the photon's path, such as through interaction with another particle, alters the experiment's outcome. The Mach-Zehnder interferometer is referenced as a tool that demonstrates how "which way information" can destroy interference, even without direct interaction. The conversation emphasizes the fundamental principle that any measurement of a photon's path inherently changes its behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer
  • Basic concepts of photon behavior and wave-particle duality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum measurement theory
  • Explore the workings of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer in detail
  • Study the implications of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate alternative methods for measuring photon paths without disrupting interference
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational experiments that illustrate the principles of wave-particle duality and quantum measurement.

michelcolman
Messages
182
Reaction score
4
The double slit experiment is often described like this:
(I'll describe the photon version, but of course the electron one is the same)

"We fire individual photons at a screen with two slits. An interference pattern appears. But when we try to look at the slits to figure out which slit the photon went through, the interference pattern disappears!"

But how do we 'look at' those slits? How do you figure out whether a photon (or electron) went throug a particular slit or not? You could let it interfere with an electron which absorbs the photon and emits a new one, generating some current while doing so. But it's rather obvious that this changes the whole experiment, there's really no mystery! Are there any other ways of 'looking' at those photons that don't completely obviously and unmysteriously change the whole setup?

Otherwise, it's a bit like saying "hey, this tennis ball gun is shooting all balls in the same direction, but when I just 'look at' the balls by hitting them with a tennis racket, they go all over the place!"

Is there something I'm missing? Or is that just all there is to it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no need of an interaction between light and something else: "which way information" is enough to destroy interference.
See "Mach-Zehnder interferometer":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach–Zehnder_interferometer

Referring to the first picture up right, without an obstacle in the position where is the "sample" there is interference and you will have 100% of the light in detector 1 and 0% in detector 2 (the first beam splitter, that is the one closer to the light source, is the analogous to the two slits).

With an obstacle (totally absorbing light) in the position of the "sample": detector 1 will fire 25% of the times, and so detector 2. Explaining this result with the "particle" paradigma is the "mistery": if the photon, after the first beam splitter, takes the route to the right, why should detector 2 fire at all?
 
Last edited:
For an easy explanation see:

http://soi.blogspot.com/2011/02/two-slit-experiment.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K