How to merge beams with POVMs?

  • Thread starter naima
  • Start date
  • #1
naima
Gold Member
938
54
When in a stern-gerlach electrons are not detected the two beams can merge behind. We just have to add the amplitudes.
this is easy because up> and down> are orthogonal.
Suppose that we have a POVM setup with 3 output channels: F1 F2 and F3 as operators. They sum to Id but have not to be orthogonal.
there are three detectors which click with probabilities P1 P2 and P3 (##Pi = Tr(\rho Fi)##)
Suppose now that we replace detectors 1 and 2 by a merger Have we to add F1 and F2? (add probabilities).
With ##F1 = M1^\dagger M1## and ##F2 = M2^\dagger M2## we would get
##M1^\dagger M1 + M2^\dagger M2## and not ##(M1+M)^\dagger(M+M)##
This is not the same. so what is the rule when we merge beams?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
kith
Science Advisor
1,348
452
In theory, it depends on the experimental setup. If you just split the beam and remerge it, you have a coherent process and add amplitudes. If you prepare two different ensembles ρ1 and ρ2 and mix them, you have an incoherent process and add probabilities.

In practice, I don't think it makes much difference how you model the situation. Decoherence in the first process makes the outcome look identical to the second.
 
  • #3
naima
Gold Member
938
54
Man'ko gave https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222549915_Inner_composition_law_of_pure_states_as_a_purification_of_impure_states [Broken].
There is a composition law for density matrices.
look at (eq 17)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads on How to merge beams with POVMs?

Replies
62
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
960
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
988
Replies
15
Views
1K
Top