Trace Distance in quantum mechanics

Emil_M
Messages
45
Reaction score
2
Hi, I am trying to familiarize myself with the quantum mechanical trace distance and hit a brick wall. Thus, I would appreciate your help with the matter!

I am reading up on trace distance using Nielsen, Chunang - Quantum Computation and Quantum Information and Bengtsson, Zyczkowski - Geometry of quantum states; an introduction to quantum entanglement.

Unfortunately, I can't seem to wrap my head around the prove of Theorem 9.1 in Nielsen, Chuang.

It states:

Let ##\{E_m\}## be a set of POVMs, with ##p_m:=tr(\rho E_m)## and ##q_m:=tr(\sigma E_m)## as the probabilities of obtaining a measurement outcome labeled by ##m##. Then ##D(\rho,\sigma) = max_{\{E_m\}} D(q_m, q_m)##, where the maximization is over all POVMs.

The prove of this theorem states:

Note that ##D(p_m,q_m ) =\frac{1}{2} \sum_m |tr(E_m(\rho-\sigma))|##.

Using the spectral decomposition, we may write ##\sigma - \rho =Q-S##, where ##Q## and ##S## are positive operators with orthogonal support. Thus ##|\rho-\sigma| = Q+S##.
Here ##|A|:=\sqrt{|A^\dagger A|}##How exactly does one obtain this last relation?

I have tried writing ##\rho-\sigma## as ##UDU^\dagger## and split the diagonal matrix into positive and negative parts.

This yields:

[itex]\rho-\sigma= UQU^\dagger + USU^\dagger[/itex]

[itex]\begin{align*}|\rho-\sigma|&=\sqrt{\big( UDU^\dagger\big)^\dagger \big( UDU^\dagger\big)}\\<br /> &=\sqrt{\big( UD^\dagger U^\dagger\big) \big( UDU^\dagger\big)}\\<br /> &=UDU^\dagger = Q-S\end{align*}[/itex] since ##D## is diagonal and real, right?

However that doesn't look like it's correct at all.

Could you guys help me out? Thanks!
 
The OP might already solved the problem, but here we go.
Emil_M said:
Using the spectral decomposition, we may write ##\sigma - \rho =Q-S##, where ##Q## and ##S## are positive operators with orthogonal support.
The keyword is "orthogonal". ## \rho - \sigma ## is Hermitian so by the spectral decomposition,
[tex]\rho - \sigma = \sum_i \lambda_i P_i,[/tex]
where the ##\lambda_i##'s are eigenvalues with the corresponding orthogonal projections ##P_i## onto the eigenvectors. Both [tex]\sum_{\substack{i \\ \lambda_i \ge 0}} \lambda_i P_i[/tex] and [tex]- \sum_{\substack{i \\ \lambda_i < 0}} \lambda_i P_i[/tex] are positive operators. Call them ##Q## and ##S## respectively so that [tex]\rho - \sigma = Q - S.[/tex]
Then ## | \rho - \sigma | = Q + S ## because ##Q## and ##S## are orthogonal i.e. ##QS = SQ = 0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K