How to model a classical bath?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IsNoGood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling the interaction between a quantum spin system and a classical bath. The Hamiltonian is defined as H = H_b + \vec{\sigma}\vec{A}, where H_b represents the bath dynamics, and \vec{A} models the interaction. The user seeks a generic model for coupling the spin to a classical bath and explores the implications of magnetic moments and external fields on this interaction. The conclusion suggests using a vector of Gaussian distributed random variables, \vec{c}(t), to represent the coupling in all directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin systems and Hamiltonians.
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of classical statistical mechanics and the concept of baths.
  • Basic grasp of Gaussian distributions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research classical bath models in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of magnetic moments in classical systems.
  • Investigate the role of external magnetic fields in spin-bath interactions.
  • Study Gaussian random processes and their applications in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the interaction between quantum systems and classical environments.

IsNoGood
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I recently had to do with a model of a single Spin coupled to a very generic quantum mechanical bath (the actual point was finding pulses that manipulate the spin as accurate as possible despite having a finite length in time but as this doesn't have anything to do with my questions I'll just omit their hamiltonians):

H = H_b + \vec{\sigma}\vec{A}
where H_b describes the internal dynamics of the bath, \vec{\sigma} is the well known pauli matrix-vector and \vec{A} a vector containing operators which model the interaction between the spin (in its 3 directions, of course) and the bath.
In subsequent calculations, it was important not to define either H_b or \vec{A} any further. To remain as generic as possible, even [H_b,\vec{A}] \neq 0 was assumed, only [\vec{A},\vec{\sigma}] = 0 was exploited later.

To put it in a nutshell:
I now made up two questions, being
1.is it possible to find a similarly generic model which describes the coupling of the spin to a classical bath and
2. what would a toy model of such a system look like?

Every hint is appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the components of the classical bath have magnetic moments associated with them, then you will get a *direct* coupling to the classical bath, otherwise there should be no *direct* coupling as far as I can tell. Of course, if the spins are carried by particles, and the classical bath is represented as an ensemble of particles, then there will be an indirect coupling through collisions between the particles. Another possibility is that if there is an external magnetic field present, its effects on the collisional dynamics between the particles carrying spins and the bath particles would need to be accounted for.

Does that help?
 
Thank you for your answer SpectraCat, it was indeed helpful. After some additional research, It led me to the following conclusion:

I guess what I was searching for can be best described by
\vec{\sigma}\vec{A} \rightarrow \vec{\sigma}\vec{c}(t)
where \vec{c}(t) is a vector of gaussian distributed random variables modeling the coupling of the spin to the classical bath in every direction. (By the way, does anybody have an idea what could reasonably be chosen to be the mean \mu of this gaussian distribution?)

However, there's still one question left:
In the case of a classical bath, is there anything corresponding to the inner dynamics H_b of the quantum bath?

As always, every hint is greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
IsNoGood
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
872
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K